Display associated types of implementors
Fixes#86631.
Contrary to before, it doesn't display methods. I also had to "resurrect" the `auto-hide-trait-implementations` setting. :3
Only question at this point: should I move the `render_impl` boolean arguments into one struct? We're starting to have quite a lot of them...
cc `@cynecx`
r? `@camelid`
[rustdoc] Wrap code blocks in <code> tag
This PR modifies Rustdoc output so that fenced code snippets, items and whole file source codes are wrapped in `<pre><code>` instead of just `<pre>`. This should improve the semantic meaning of the generated content.
I'm not sure what to do about `render_attributes_in_pre` and `render_attributes_in_code`. These functions were clearly expected to be used for things inside `<pre>` or `<code>`, and since I added `<code>` in this PR, some of them will be used in a different context than before. However, it seems to me that even before they were not consistent. For example, `item_constant` used `render_attributes_in_code` for its attributes, however there was no `<code>` used for constants before this PR...
Should I create some `rustdoc-gui` tests? For example to check that all `<pre>` tags have a `<code>` child?
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88020
rustdoc: Restore --default-theme, etc, by restoring varname escaping
In #86157cd0f93193c
Use Tera templates for rustdoc.
dropped the following transformation from the keys of the default settings element's `data-` attribute names:
.map(|(k, v)| format!(r#" data-{}="{}""#, k.replace('-', "_"), Escape(v)))
The `Escape` part is indeed no longer needed, because Tera does that for us. But the massaging of `-` to `_` is needed, for the (bizarre) reasons explained in the new comments.
I have tested that the default theme function works again for me. I have also verified that passing (in shell syntax)
'--default-theme="zork&"'
escapes the value in the HTML.
Closes#87263
Fix sidebar display on small devices
Part of #87059.
Instead of hiding the sidebar on small devices, we instead move it out of the viewport so that it remains "visible" to our text only users.
Could you confirm it works for you `@ahicks92` and `@DataTriny` please? You can give it a try at [this URL](https://guillaume-gomez.fr/rustdoc-test/test_docs/index.html).
r? `@notriddle`
Fix codeblocks overflow
Fixes#87043.
Instead of completely relying on `pulldown-cmark` (and its potential changes), I decided to move the generation of codeblocks HTML directly in rustdoc so we can unify the DOM and the CSS classes.
r? `@Nemo157`
Add GUI test for "go to first" feature
It adds a test for #85876 to ensure the feature is working as expected and prevent potential regression.
cc ```@jeanlucthumm```
r? ```@Manishearth```
