This is for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114341
The `meta.len() > 0` condition here is intended for inputs only,
ie. when input is in the `/proc` filesystem as documented.
That inaccurately included empty output files which are then shunted to
the sendfile() routine leading to higher than nescessary IO util in some
cases, specifically with CoW filesystems like btrfs.
Further, `NoneObtained` is not relevant in this context, so remove it.
Simply, determine what is input or output given the passed enum Unit.
Add `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` target
This introduces `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` as the first Rust target for the [Unikraft] Unikernel Development Kit.
[Unikraft]: https://unikraft.org/
Unikraft imitates Linux and uses musl as libc.
It is extremely configurable, and does not even provide a `poll` implementation or a network stack, unless enabled by the end user who compiles the application.
Our approach for integrating the build process with `rustc` is to hide the build process as well as the actual final linking step behind a linker-shim (`kraftld`, see https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit/issues/612).
## Tier 3 target policy
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the target maintainer.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target name `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` was derived from `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl`, setting Unikraft as vendor.
Unikraft exactly imitates Linux + musl.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
No dependencies were added to Rust.
Requirements for linking are [Unikraft] and [KraftKit] (both BSD-3-Clause), but none of these are added to Rust.
[KraftKit]: https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
I am not a member of a Rust team.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
Understood.
`std` is supported.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Building is described in the platform support doc.
It will be updated once proper `kraftld` support has landed.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I don't think this PR breaks anything.
r? compiler-team
Allow limited access to `OsString` bytes
This extends #109698 to allow no-cost conversion between `Vec<u8>` and `OsString` as suggested in feedback from `os_str_bytes` crate in #111544.
Revert the lexing of `c"…"` string literals
Fixes \[after beta-backport\] #113235.
Further progress is tracked in #113333.
This PR *manually* reverts parts of #108801 (since a git-revert would've been too coarse-grained & messy)
and git-reverts #111647.
CC `@fee1-dead` (#108801) `@klensy` (#111647)
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@rustbot` label F-c_str_literals beta-nominated
Move windows-sys arm32 shim to c.rs
This moves the arm32 shim in to c.rs instead of appending to the generated file itself.
This makes it simpler to change these workarounds if/when needed. The downside is we need to exclude a couple of functions from being generated (see the comment). A metadata solution could help here but they'll be easy enough to add back if that happens.
fix: get the l4re target working again
This is based on work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103966, addressing the review comment by `@m-ou-se` at the time and "fixing" the (probably newly) missing read_buf.
Implement `TryFrom<&OsStr>` for `&str`
Recently when trying to work with `&OsStr` I was surprised to find this `impl` missing.
Since the `to_str` method already existed the actual implementation is fairly non-controversial, except for maybe the choice of the error type. I chose an opaque error here instead of something like `std::str::Utf8Error`, since that would already make a number of assumption about the underlying implementation of `OsStr`.
As this is a trait implementation, it is insta-stable, if I'm not mistaken?
Either way this will need an FCP.
I chose "1.64.0" as the version, since this is unlikely to land before the beta cut-off.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-libs-api
API Change Proposal: rust-lang/rust#99031 (accepted)
Avoid unwind across `extern "C"` in `thread_local::fast_local`
This is a minimal fix for #112285, in case we want a simple patch that can be easily to backported if that's desirable.
*(Note: I have another broader cleanup which I've mostly omitted from here to avoid clutter, except for the `Cell` change, which isn't needed to fix UB, but simplifies safety comments).*
The only tier-1 target that this occurs on in a way that seems likely to cause problems in practice linux-gnu, although I believe some folks care about that platform somewhat 😉. I'm unsure how big of an issue this is. I've seen stuff like this behave quite badly, but there's a number of reasons to think this might actually be "fine in practice".
I've hedged my bets and assumed we'll backport this at least to beta but my feeling is that there's not enough evidence this is a problem worth backporting further than that.
### More details
This issue seems to have existed since `thread_local!`'s `const` init functionality was added. It occurs if you have a `const`-initialized thread local for a type that `needs_drop`, the drop panics, and you're on a target with support for static thread locals. In this case, we will end up defining an `extern "C"` function in the user crate rather than in libstd, and because the user crate will not have `#![feature(c_unwind)]` enabled, their panic will not be caught by an auto-inserted abort guard.
In practice, the actual situation where problems are likely[^ub] is somewhat narrower.
On most targets with static thread locals, we manage the TLS dtor list by hand (for reentrancy reasons among others). In these cases, while the users code may panic, we're calling it inside our own `extern "C"` (or `extern "system"`) function, which seems to (at least in practice) catch the panic and convert it to an abort.
However, on a few targets, most notably linux-gnu with recent glibc (but also fuchsia and redox), a tls dtor registration mechanism exists which we can actually use directly, [`__cxa_thread_atexit_impl`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/library/std/src/sys/unix/thread_local_dtor.rs#L26-L36).
This is the case that seems most likely to be a cause for concern, as now we're passing a function to the system library and panicking out of it in a case where there are may not be Rust frames above it on the call stack (since it's running thread shutdown), and even if there were, it may not be prepared to handle such unwinding. If that's the case, it'd be bad.
Is it? Dunno. The fact that it's a `__cxa_*` function makes me think they probably have considered that the callback could throw but I have no evidence here and it doesn't seem to be written down anywhere, so it's just a guess. (I would not be surprised if someone comes into this thread to tell me how definitely-bad-news it is).
That said, as I said, all this is actually UB! If this isn't a "technically UB but fine in practice", but all bets are off if this is the kind of thing we are telling LLVM about.
[^ub]: This is UB so take that with a grain of salt -- I'm absolutely making assumptions about how the UB will behave "in practice" here, which is almost certainly a mistake.
