Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95587 (Remove need for associated_type_bounds in std.)
- #95589 (Include a header in .rlink files)
- #95593 (diagnostics: add test case for bogus T:Sized suggestion)
- #95597 (Refer to u8 by absolute path in expansion of thread_local)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Include a header in .rlink files
I couldn't find the right place where to put tests. Is there some location that tests `.rlink` creation and loading?
I only found `src/test/run-make-fulldeps/separate-link/Makefile`, but I'm not sure how to check the error message in the Makefile.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95297
r? `@bjorn3`
Make GATs object safe under generic_associated_types_extended feature
Based on #94869
Let's say we have
```rust
trait StreamingIterator {
type Item<'a> where Self: 'a;
}
```
And `dyn for<'a> StreamingIterator<Item<'a> = &'a i32>`.
If we ask `(dyn for<'a> StreamingIterator<Item<'a> = &'a i32>): StreamingIterator`, then we have to prove that `for<'x> (&'x i32): Sized`. So, we generate *new* bound vars to subst for the GAT generics.
Importantly, this doesn't fully verify that these are usable and sound.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Add error message suggestion for missing noreturn in naked function
I had to google the syntax for inline asm's `noreturn` option when I got this error earlier today, so I figured I'd save others the trouble and add the syntax/fix as a suggestion in the error.
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector
The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were:
- When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable".
This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase:
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset`
--> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35
|
LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
- We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes.
This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95032 (Clean up, categorize and sort unstable features in std.)
- #95260 (Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors)
- #95293 (suggest wrapping single-expr blocks in square brackets)
- #95344 (Make `impl Debug for rustdoc::clean::Item` easier to read)
- #95388 (interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes)
- #95530 (rustdoc: do not show primitives and keywords as private)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes
We are currently enforcing `data_layout.obj_size_bound()` as the maximal dynamic size of a Rust value (including for `size_of_val_raw`), but that does not match the docs.
In particular, Miri currently falsely says that this code has UB:
```rust
#![feature(layout_for_ptr)]
fn main() {
let size = isize::MAX as usize;
// Creating a raw slice of size isize::MAX and asking for its size is okay.
let s = std::ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(1usize as *const u8, size);
assert_eq!(size, unsafe { std::mem::size_of_val_raw(s) });
}
```
Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors
1. Suppress suggestions to add `std::ops::Fn{,Mut,Once}` bounds when a type already implements `Fn{,Mut,Once}`
2. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but the arguments vary (either by number or by actual arguments)
3. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but not the right one (e.g. implements `FnMut`, but `Fn` is required).
Fixes#95147
A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
