Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #141267 (only resolve top-level guard patterns' guards once)
- #141280 (Use Docker cache from the current repository)
- #141296 (Async drop fix for 'broken mir, place has deref as later projection')
- #141328 (When AsyncDrop impl is empty, sync drop generated in elaborator)
- #141332 (Do not eagerly fold consts in `normalize_param_env_or_error` if new solver)
- #141333 (Use `DeepRejectCtxt` in `assemble_inherent_candidates_from_param`)
- #141334 (eagerly check nested obligations when coercing fndefs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Match on lang item kind instead of using an if/else chain
Similar to how the new solver does this. Just noticed while I was adding a new entry to the chain 😆
Make well-formedness predicates no longer coinductive
This PR makes well-formedness no longer coinductive. It was made coinductive in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98542, but AFAICT this was only to fix UI tests since we stopped lowering `where Ty:` to an empty-region outlives predicate but to a WF predicate instead.
Arguably it should lower to something completely different, something like a "type mentioned no-op predicate", but well-formedness serves this purpose fine today, and since no code (according to crater) relies on this coinductive behavior, we'd like to avoid having to emulate it in the new solver.
Fixes#123456 (I didn't want to add a test since it seems low-value to have a ICE test for a fuzzer minimization that is basically garbage code.)
Fixes#109764 (not sure if this behavior is emulatable w/o coinductive WF?)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/169
r? lcnr
trait_sel: deep reject `match_normalize_trait_ref`
Spotted during an in-person review of #137944 at RustWeek: `match_normalize_trait_ref` could be using `DeepRejectCtxt` to exit early as an optimisation for projection candidates, like is done with param candidates.
r? `@lcnr`
cc `@oli-obk`
Use the new solver in the `impossible_predicates`
The old solver is unsound for many reasons. One of which was weaponized by `@lcnr` in #140212, where the old solver was incompletely considering a dyn vtable method to be impossible and replacing its vtable entry with a null value. This null function could be called post-mono.
The new solver is expected to be less incomplete due to its correct handling of higher-ranked aliases in relate. This PR switches the `impossible_predicates` query to use the new solver, which patches this UB.
r? lcnr
Spotted during an in-person review of unrelated changes,
`match_normalize_trait_ref` could be using `DeepRejectCtxt` to exit early
as an optimisation for prejection candidates, like is done in param
candidates.
Replace use of rustc_type_ir by rustc_middle
cc #138449
I want to help on this issue. I have replaced all the rustc_type_ir uses by the equivalent type in rustc_middle.
DelayedSet is also re-exposed by rustc_middle.
This commit does the following:
- Replaces use of rustc_type_ir by rustc_middle
- Removes the rustc_type_ir dependency
- The DelayedSet type is exposed by rustc_middle so everything can be
accessed through rustc_middle in a coherent manner.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140056 (Fix a wrong error message in 2024 edition)
- #140220 (Fix detection of main function if there are expressions around it)
- #140249 (Remove `weak` alias terminology)
- #140316 (Introduce `BoxMarker` to improve pretty-printing correctness)
- #140347 (ci: clean more disk space in codebuild)
- #140349 (ci: use aws codebuild for the `dist-x86_64-linux` job)
- #140379 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove `weak` alias terminology
I find the "weak" alias terminology to be quite confusing. It implies the existence of "strong" aliases (which do not exist) and I'm not really sure what about weak aliases is "weak". I much prefer "free alias" as the term. I think it's much more obvious what it means as "free function" is a well defined term that already exists in rust.
It's also a little confusing given "weak alias" is already a term in linker/codegen spaces which are part of the compiler too. Though I'm not particularly worried about that as it's usually very obvious if you're talking about the type system or not lol. I'm also currently trying to write documentation about aliases and it's somewhat awkward/confusing to be talking about *weak* aliases, when I'm not really sure what the basis for that as the term actually *is*.
I would also be happy to just find out there's a nice meaning behind calling them "weak" aliases :-)
r? `@oli-obk`
maybe we want a types MCP to decide on a specific naming here? or maybe we think its just too late to go back on this naming decision ^^'
Remove comment about handling non-global where bounds with corresponding projection
This comment is no longer relevant since we only assemble rigid projections if no param-env candidates hold.
Also remove a stray comment from the old solver.
r? lcnr
Rename `compute_x` methods
r? ```@lcnr```
I find the `compute_x` naming scheme to be overly confusing. It means `compute_wf_obligations_for_x_and_add_them_to_self` but shortens out all of the important parts of the actual operation being performed. `compute_x` sounds like its somehow performing `x`, maybe even returning it from the function, which is not true.
I've had some newer contributors be confused by this naming scheme so I think it's good to change it to something more self-evident
Some misc drive by niceties while I was here too.
I found these by grepping for `&[a-z_\.]*\.clone()`, i.e. expressions
like `&a.b.clone()`, which are sometimes unnecessary clones, and also
looking at clones nearby to cases like that.
