Select obligations before processing wf obligation in `compare_method_predicate_entailment`
We need to select obligations before processing the WF obligation for the `IMPLIED_BOUNDS_ENTAILMENT` lint, since it skips over type variables.
Fixes#114783
r? `@jackh726`
TAITs do not constrain generic params
Fixes#108425
Not sure if I should rework those two failing tests. I guess `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/coherence.rs` could just have the type parameter removed from it? IDK what `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/coherence_generalization.rs` is even testing, though.
r? `@aliemjay`
cc `@lcnr` `@oli-obk` (when he's back from 🌴)
Also consider `mem::transmute` with the `invalid_reference_casting` lint
This PR extend the `invalid_reference_casting` lint with regard to the `std::mem::transmute` function.
```
error: casting `&T` to `&mut T` is undefined behavior, even if the reference is unused, consider instead using an `UnsafeCell`
--> $DIR/reference_casting.rs:27:16
|
LL | let _num = &mut *std::mem::transmute::<_, *mut i32>(&num);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
*I encourage anyone reviewing this PR to do so [without whitespaces](https://github.blog/2011-10-21-github-secrets/#whitespace).*
normalize in `trait_ref_is_knowable` in new solver
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/51
Alternatively we could avoid normalizing the self type and do this at the end of the `assemble_candidates_via_self_ty` stack by splitting candidates into:
- applicable without normalizing self type
- applicable for aliases, even if they can be normalized
- applicable for stuff which cannot get normalized further
I don't think this would have any significant benefits and it also seems non-trivial to avoid normalizing only the self type in `trait_ref_is_knowable`.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94455 (Partially stabilize `int_roundings`)
- #114132 (Better Debug for Vars and VarsOs)
- #114584 (E0277 nolonger points at phantom `.await`)
- #114667 (Record binder for bare trait object in LifetimeCollectVisitor)
- #114692 (downgrade `internal_features` to warn)
- #114703 (Cover ParamConst in smir)
- #114734 (Mark oli as "on vacation")
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Respect `#[expect]` the same way `#[allow]` is with the `dead_code` lint
This PR makes the `#[expect]` attribute being respected in the same way the `#[allow]` attribute is with the `dead_code` lint.
The fix is much more involved than I would have liked (and it's not because I didn't tried!), because the implementation took advantage of the fact that firing a lint in a allow context is a nop (for the user, as the lint is suppressed) to not fire-it at all.
And will it's fine for `#[allow]`, it definitively isn't for `#[expect]`, as the presence and absence of the lint is significant. So a big part of the PR is just adding the context information of whenever an item is on the worklist because of an `[allow]`/`#[expect]` or not.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114557
We've investigated one reason why debugging information often goes wrong at https://reviews.llvm.org/D152095.
> LLVM can't handle IR where subprogram definitions are nested within DICompositeType when doing LTO builds,
> because there's no good way to cross the CU boundary to insert a nested DISubprogram definition in one CU into a type defined in another CU.
Tell LLVM that the negation in `<*const T>::sub` cannot overflow
Today it's just `sub` <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/8EzEPnMr5>; with this PR it's `sub nsw`.
make `typeid::typeid_itanium_cxx_abi::transform_ty` evaluate length in array types
the ICE in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114275 was caused by `transform_ty`
in compiler/rustc_symbol_mangling/src/typeid/typeid_itanium_cxx_abi.rs encountering an unevaluated const, while expecting it to already be evaluated.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114599 (Add impl trait declarations to SMIR)
- #114622 (rustc: Move `crate_types` and `stable_crate_id` from `Session` to `GlobalCtxt`)
- #114662 (Unlock trailing where-clauses for lazy type aliases)
- #114693 (Remove myself from the review rotation)
- #114694 (make the provisional cache slightly less broken)
- #114705 (Add spastorino to mailmap)
- #114712 (Fix a couple of bad comments)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
make the provisional cache slightly less broken
It is still broken for the following cycles:
```mermaid
graph LR
R["R: coinductive"] --> A["A: inductive"]
R --> B["B: coinductive"]
A --> B
B --> R
```
the `R -> A -> B -> R` cycle should be considered to not hold, as it is mixed, but because we first put `B` into the cache from the `R -> B -> R` cycle which is coinductive, it does hold.
This issue will also affect our new coinduction approach. Longterm cycles are coinductive as long as one step goes through an impl where-clause, see f4fc5bae36/crates/formality-prove/src/prove/prove_wc.rs (L51-L62). Here we would first have a fully inductive cycle `R -> B -> R` which is then entered by a cycle with a coinductive step `R -> A -coinductive-> B -> R`.
I don't know how to soundly implement a provisional cache for goals not on the stack without tracking all cycles the goal was involved in and whether they were inductive or not. We could then only use goals from the cache if the *inductivity?* of every cycle remained the same. This is a mess to implement. I therefore want to rip out the provisional cache entirely, but will wait with this until I talked about it with `@nikomatsakis.`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Unlock trailing where-clauses for lazy type aliases
Allows trailing where-clauses on lazy type aliases and forbids[^1] leading ones.
Completes #89122 (see section *Top-level type aliases*).
`@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias
r? `@oli-obk`
[^1]: This is absolutely fine since lazy type aliases are only meant to be stabilized as part of a new edition.
`Expr::can_have_side_effects()` is incorrect for struct/enum/array/tuple literals
It would return 'false' unless *all* sub-expressions had side effects. This would easily allow side effects to slip through, and also wrongly label empty literals as having side effects. Add some tests for the last point
The function is only used for simple lints and error messages, so not a serious bug.
this ICE was caused by `transform_ty`
in compiler/rustc_symbol_mangling/src/typeid/typeid_itanium_cxx_abi.rs
encountering an unevaluated const, while expecting it to already be evaluated.
add a regression test
Update tests/ui/sanitize/issue-114275-cfi-const-expr-in-arry-len.rs
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
Update tests/ui/sanitize/issue-114275-cfi-const-expr-in-arry-len.rs
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
fix test compiling for targets with -crt-static and failing
this was causign https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114686 to fail
Don't use `type_of` to determine if item has intrinsic shim
When we're calling `resolve_instance` on an inline const, we were previously looking at the `type_of` for that const, seeing that it was an `extern "intrinsic"` fn def, and treating it as if we were computing the instance of that intrinsic itself. This is incorrect.
Instead, we should be using the def-id of the item we're computing to determine if it's an intrinsic.
Fixes#114660
Detect method not found on arbitrary self type with different mutability
```
error[E0599]: no method named `x` found for struct `Pin<&S>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:11:18
|
LL | Pin::new(&S).x();
| ^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `y`
|
note: method is available for `Pin<&mut S>`
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:6:5
|
LL | fn x(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Related to #57994, as one of the presented cases can lead to code like this.
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions
Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g.
```rust
static mut CNT: usize = 0;
pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() {
unsafe {
CNT += 1;
}
}
```
to produce highly effective assembly like:
```asm
pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() {
420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16
unsafe {
CNT += 1;
420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp)
420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp)
420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80
420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0>
420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1
420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0)
}
}
420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp)
420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp)
420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16
420003ba: 30200073 mret
```
(disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`)
This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill.
At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`).
This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc].
Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts.
Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades).
[clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v
[full-frame-save]: 9281af2ecf/src/lib.rs (L440-L469)
[implemented by]: b7fb2a3fec/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp (L61-L67)
[callee-save]: 973f1fe7a8/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td (L30-L37)
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
