Don't ICE if method receiver fails to unify with `arbitrary_self_types`
Consider:
```rust
struct Foo(u32);
impl Foo {
fn get<R: Deref<Target=Self>>(self: R) -> u32 {
self.0
}
}
fn main() {
let mut foo = Foo(1);
foo.get::<&Foo>();
}
```
The problem here is that with `arbitrary_self_types`, we're allowed to have a method receiver that mentions generics from the method itself (`fn get<R: Deref<Target=Self>>(self: R)`). Since we don't actually take into account the user-written turbofish generics when doing method lookup (nor do we check that method predicates hold), method probing will happily infer `R = Foo` during the probe. When we later confirm the method, we do use the turbofish'd subst and instead now have that `R = &Foo`. This doesn't unify with the self type we chose during the probe, causing an ICE.
Getting this to work correctly will be difficult. Specifically, we'll need to actually pass in the turbofish generics for the method being probed for and check that the self type unifies considering those generics. This seems like a lot of work, and I'm not actually familiar with the restrictions originally called out for `#![feature(arbitrary_self_types)]`, but I think we should probably instead just deny having receivers that mention (type/const) generics that come from the method itself.
But I mostly just want to turn this ICE into an error, so I'll leave that up for later PRs.
Fixes#111838
Check opaques for mismatch during writeback
Revive #111705.
I realized that we don't need to put any substs in the writeback results since all of the hidden types have already been remapped. See the comment in `compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/typeck_results.rs`, which should make that clear for other explorers of the codebase.
Additionally, we need to do some diagnostic stashing because the diagnostics we produce during HIR typeck is very poor and we should prefer the diagnostic that comes from MIR, if we have one.
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove return type sized check hack from hir typeck
Remove a bunch of special-cased suggestions when someone returns `-> dyn Trait` that checks for type equality, etc.
This was a pretty complex piece of code that also relied on a hack in hir typeck (see changes to `compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/check.rs`), and I'm not convinced that it's necessary to maintain, when all we really need to tell the user is that they should return `-> impl Trait` or `-> Box<dyn Trait>`, depending on their specific use-case.
This is necessary because we may need to move the "return type is sized" check from hir typeck to wfcheck, which does not have access to typeck results. This is a prerequisite for that, and I'm fairly confident that the diagnostics "regressions" here are not a big deal.
[rustc_ty_utils] Treat `drop_in_place`'s *mut argument like &mut when adding LLVM attributes
This resurrects PR #103614, which has sat idle for a while.
This could probably use a new perf run, since we're on a new LLVM version now.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@RalfJung`
---
LLVM can make use of the `noalias` parameter attribute on the parameter to `drop_in_place` in areas like argument promotion. Because the Rust compiler fully controls the code for `drop_in_place`, it can soundly deduce parameter attributes on it.
In #103957, Miri was changed to retag `drop_in_place`'s argument as if it was `&mut`, matching this change.
Deal with unnormalized projections when structurally resolving types with new solver
1. Normalize types in `structurally_resolved_type` when the new solver is enabled
2. Normalize built-in autoderef targets in `Autoderef` when the new solver is enabled
3. Normalize-erasing-regions in `resolve_type` in writeback
This is motivated by the UI test provided, which currently fails with:
```
error[E0609]: no field `x` on type `<usize as SliceIndex<[Foo]>>::Output`
--> <source>:9:11
|
9 | xs[0].x = 1;
| ^
```
I'm pretty happy with the approach in (1.) and (2.) and think we'll inevitably need something like this in the long-term, but (3.) seems like a hack to me. It's a *lot* of work to add tons of new calls to every user of these typeck results though (mir build, late lints, etc). Happy to discuss further.
r? `@lcnr`
Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`
The detection of slice reference of `{integral}` in `rustc_on_unimplemented` is hacky, but a proper solution requires changing `FmtPrinter` to add a parameter to print integers as `{integral}` and I didn't want to change it just for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. I can do that if requested, though.
I'm open to better wording; this is the best I could come up with.
fix recursion depth handling after confirmation
fixes#111729
I think having to use `Obligation::with_depth` correctly everywhere is very hard because e.g. the nested obligations from `eq` currently do not have the correct obligation depth.
The new solver [completely removes `recursion_depth` from obligations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/traits/solve/struct.Goal.html) and instead tracks the depth in the solver itself which is far easier to get right. Moving the old solver towards this shouldn't be that hard but is probably somewhat annoying.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Rather than returning an array of features from to_llvm_features, return a structure that contains
the dependencies. This also contains metadata on how the features depend on each other to allow for
the correct enabling and disabling.
Some features that are tied together only make sense to be folded
together when enabling the feature. For example on AArch64 sve and
neon are tied together, however it doesn't make sense to disable neon
when disabling sve.
In #91608 the fp-armv8 feature was removed as it's tied to the neon
feature. However disabling neon didn't actually disable the use of
floating point registers and instructions, for this `-fp-armv8` is
required.
Add extra debug assertions for equality for Adt/Variant/FieldDef
Would've made it easier to both catch and test https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)
This is a revival of #111523 because I think I pushed an empty branch and bors got a bit too excited it closed the PR.
Replace `QueryStruct` with arrays local to `rustc_query_impl`
This removes `QueryStruct` and instead uses constant arrays of function pointers for `try_collect_active_jobs`, `alloc_self_profile_query_strings` and `encode_query_results`. This further decouples `rustc_query_impl` from `rustc_middle`.
r? `@cjgillot`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111745 (Fix overflow in error emitter)
- #111770 (Read beta version from the version file if building from a source tarball)
- #111797 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #111809 (Unset MIRI_BLESS for mir-opt-level 4 miri tests)
- #111817 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix overflow in error emitter
Fix#109854Close#94171 (was already fixed before but missing test)
This bug happens when a multipart suggestion spans more than one line.
The fix is to update the `acc` variable, which didn't handle the case when the text to remove spans multiple lines but the text to add spans only one line.
Also, use `usize::try_from` instead of `as usize` to detect overflows earlier in the future, and point to the source of the overflow (the original issue points to a different place where this value is used, not where the overflow had happened).
And finally add an `if start != end` check to avoid doing any extra work in case of empty ranges.
Long explanation:
Given this test case:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
generate_setter,
r#"
pub(crate) struct Person<T: Clone> {}
"#,
r#""#,
);
}
```
The compiler will try to convert that code into the following:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
/* usize */,
);
}
```
So it creates a suggestion with 3 separate parts:
```
// Replace "generate_setter" with "/* usize */"
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:5: 4:20 (#0), snippet: "/* usize */" }
// Remove second arg (multiline string)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:20: 7:3 (#0), snippet: "" }
// Remove third arg (r#""#)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:7:3: 8:11 (#0), snippet: "" }
```
Each of this parts gets a separate `SubstitutionHighlight` (this marks the relevant text green in a terminal, the values are 0-indexed so `start: 4` means column 5):
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 18446744073709551614, end: 18446744073709551614 }
```
The 2nd and 3rd suggestion are empty (start = end) because they only remove text, so there are no additions to highlight. But the 3rd span has overflowed because the compiler assumes that the 3rd suggestion is on the same line as the first suggestion. The 2nd span starts at column 20 and the highlight starts at column 16 (15+1), so that suggestion is good. But since the 3rd span starts at column 3, the result is `3 - 4`, or column -1, which turns into -2 with 0-indexed, and that's equivalent to `18446744073709551614 as isize`.
With this fix, the resulting `SubstitutionHighlight` are:
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
```
As expected. I guess ideally we shouldn't emit empty highlights when removing text, but I am too scared to change that.
Don't inline functions with unsized args
Fixes#111355 .
I have some ideas for how we can get this back in the future, out of scope for this PR though.
r? `@cjgillot`
