Include the computed alignment of the violating field when rejecting
transparent types with non-trivially aligned ZSTs.
ZST member fields in transparent types must have an alignment of 1 (to
ensure it does not raise the layout requirements of the transparent
field). The current error message looks like this:
LL | struct Foobar(u32, [u32; 0]);
| ^^^^^^^^ has alignment larger than 1
This patch changes the report to include the alignment of the violating
field:
LL | struct Foobar(u32, [u32; 0]);
| ^^^^^^^^ has alignment of 4, which is larger than 1
In case of unknown alignments, it will yield:
LL | struct Foobar<T>(u32, [T; 0]);
| ^^^^^^ may have alignment larger than 1
This allows developers to get a better grasp why a specific field is
rejected. Knowing the alignment of the violating field makes it easier
to judge where that alignment-requirement originates, and thus hopefully
provide better hints on how to mitigate the problem.
This idea was proposed in 2022 in #98071 as part of a bigger change.
This commit simply extracts this error-message change, to decouple it
from the other diagnostic improvements.
Drop duplicate helper methods on `Layout`, which are already implemented
on `LayoutS`. Note that `Layout` has a `Deref` implementation to
`LayoutS`, so all accessors are automatically redirected.
The methods are identical and have been copied to `rustc_abi` in:
commit 390a637e29
Author: hamidreza kalbasi <hamidrezakalbasi@protonmail.com>
Date: Mon Nov 7 00:36:11 2022 +0330
move things from rustc_target::abi to rustc_abi
This commit left behind the original implementation. Drop it now.
Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david@readahead.eu>
Use SHA256 source file checksums by default when targeting MSVC
Currently, when targeting Windows (more specifically, the MSVC toolchain), Rust will use SHA1 source file checksums by default. SHA1 has been superseded by SHA256, and Microsoft recommends migrating to SHA256.
As of Visual Studio 2022, MSVC defaults to SHA256. This change aligns Rust and MSVC.
LLVM can already use SHA256 checksums, so this does not require any change to LLVM.
MSVC docs on source file checksums: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zh?view=msvc-170
Support `--print KIND=PATH` command line syntax
As is already done for `--emit KIND=PATH` and `-L KIND=PATH`.
In the discussion of #110785, it was pointed out that `--print KIND=PATH` is nicer than trying to apply the single global `-o` path to `--print`'s output, because in general there can be multiple print requests within a single rustc invocation, and anyway `-o` would already be used for a different meaning in the case of `link-args` and `native-static-libs`.
I am interested in using `--print cfg=PATH` in Buck2. Currently Buck2 works around the lack of support for `--print KIND=PATH` by [indirecting through a Python wrapper script](d43cf3a51a/prelude/rust/tools/get_rustc_cfg.py) to redirect rustc's stdout into the location dictated by the build system.
From skimming Cargo's usages of `--print`, it definitely seems like it would benefit from `--print KIND=PATH` too. Currently it is working around the lack of this by inserting `--crate-name=___ --print=crate-name` so that it can look for a line containing `___` as a delimiter between the 2 other `--print` informations it actually cares about. This is commented as a "HACK" and "abuse". 31eda6f7c3/src/cargo/core/compiler/build_context/target_info.rs (L242) (FYI `@weihanglo` as you dealt with this recently in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/11633.)
Mentioning reviewers active in #110785: `@fee1-dead` `@jyn514` `@bjorn3`
Resurrect: rustc_llvm: Add a -Z `print-codegen-stats` option to expose LLVM statistics.
This resurrects PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000, which has sat idle for a while. And I want to see the effect of stack-move optimizations on LLVM (like https://reviews.llvm.org/D153453) :).
I have applied the changes requested by `@oli-obk` and `@nagisa` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014625377 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014642482 in the latest commits.
r? `@oli-obk`
-----
LLVM has a neat [statistics](https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-statistic-class-stats-option) feature that tracks how often optimizations kick in. It's very handy for optimization work. Since we expose the LLVM pass timings, I thought it made sense to expose the LLVM statistics too.
-----
(Edit: fix broken link
(Edit2: fix segmentation fault and use malloc
If `rustc` is built with
```toml
[llvm]
assertions = true
```
Then you can see like
```
rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
3 aa - Number of MayAlias results
193 aa - Number of MustAlias results
531 aa - Number of NoAlias results
...
```
And the current default build emits only
```
$ rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
$
```
This might be better to emit the message to tell assertion flag necessity, but now I can't find how to do that...
THis significantly complicates `NaiveLayout` logic, but is necessary to
ensure that bounds like `NonNull<T>: PointerLike` hold in generic
contexts.
Also implement exact layout computation for structs.
Always const-prop scalars and scalar pairs
This removes some complexity from the pass.
The limitation to propagate ScalarPairs only for tuple comes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67015, when ScalarPair constant were modeled using `Rvalue::Aggregate`. Nowadays, we use `ConstValue::ByRef`, which does not care about the underlying type.
The justification for not propagating in all cases was perf. This seems not to be a clear cut any more: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113858#issuecomment-1642396746
Refactor vtable encoding and optimize it for the case of multiple marker traits
This PR does two things
- Refactor `prepare_vtable_segments` (this was motivated by the other change, `prepare_vtable_segments` was quite hard to understand and while trying to edit it I've refactored it)
- Mostly remove `loop`s labeled `break`s/`continue`s whenever there is a simpler solution
- Also use `?`
- Make vtable format a bit more efficient wrt to marker traits
- See the tests for an example
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113840
cc `@crlf0710`
----
Review wise it's probably best to review each commit individually, as then it's more clear why the refactoring is correct.
I can split the last two commits (which change behavior) into a separate PR if it makes reviewing easier
Querify unused trait check.
This code transitively loads information for all bodies, and from resolutions. As it does not return a value, it should be beneficial to have it as a query.
Don't translate compiler-internal bug messages
These are not very useful to be translated, as
* translators would get really weird and bad english versions to start out from,
* compiler devs have to do some work for what is supposed to be dead code and just a sanity check,
* the target audience is other compiler devs.
r? `@davidtwco`
new solver: don't consider blanket impls multiple times
only consider candidates which rely on the self type in `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Turn copy into moves during DSE.
Dead store elimination computes whether removing a direct store to an unborrowed place is allowed.
Where removing a store is allowed, writing `uninit` is too.
This means that we can use this pass to transform `copy` operands into `move` operands. This is only interesting in call terminators, so we only handle those.
Special care is taken for the `use_both(_1, _1)` case:
- moving the second argument is ok, as `_1` is not live after the call;
- moving the first argument is not, as the second argument reads `_1`.
Fixes#75993
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108068
r? `@RalfJung`
cc `@JakobDegen`
