Enable API documentation for `std::os::wasi`.
This adds API documentation support for `std::os::wasi` modeled after
how `std::os::unix` works, so that WASI can be documented [here] along
with the other platforms.
[here]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/index.html
Two changes of particular interest:
- This changes the `AsRawFd` for `io::Stdin` for WASI to return
`libc::STDIN_FILENO` instead of `sys::stdio::Stdin.as_raw_fd()` (and
similar for `Stdout` and `Stderr`), which matches how the `unix`
version works. `STDIN_FILENO` etc. may not always be explicitly
reserved at the WASI level, but as long as we have Rust's `std` and
`libc`, I think it's reasonable to guarantee that we'll always use
`libc::STDIN_FILENO` for stdin.
- This duplicates the `osstr2str` utility function, rather than
trying to share it across all the configurations that need it.
r? ```@alexcrichton```
This adds API documentation support for `std::os::wasi` modeled after
how `std::os::unix` works, so that WASI can be documented [here] along
with the other platforms.
[here]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/index.html
Two changes of particular interest:
- This changes the `AsRawFd` for `io::Stdin` for WASI to return
`libc::STDIN_FILENO` instead of `sys::stdio::Stdin.as_raw_fd()` (and
similar for `Stdout` and `Stderr`), which matches how the `unix`
version works. `STDIN_FILENO` etc. may not always be explicitly
reserved at the WASI level, but as long as we have Rust's `std` and
`libc`, I think it's reasonable to guarantee that we'll always use
`libc::STDIN_FILENO` for stdin.
- This duplicates the `osstr2str` utility function, rather than
trying to share it across all the configurations that need it.
I'm pretty sure I am going want this for #73125 and it seems like an
omission that would be in any case good to remedy.
It's a shame we don't have competent token pasting and case mangling
for use in macro_rules!.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
This file contained a lot of repetitive code. This was about to get
considerably worse, with introduction of a slew of new aliases.
No functional change. I've eyeballed the docs and they don't seem to
have changed either.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
A few architectures in `os::linux::raw` import `libc::stat`, rather than
defining that type directly. However, that also imports the _function_
called `stat`, which makes this doc link ambiguous:
error: `crate::os::linux::raw::stat` is both a struct and a function
--> library/std/src/os/linux/fs.rs:21:19
|
21 | /// [`stat`]: crate::os::linux::raw::stat
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ambiguous link
|
= note: `-D broken-intra-doc-links` implied by `-D warnings`
help: to link to the struct, prefix with the item type
|
21 | /// [`stat`]: struct@crate::os::linux::raw::stat
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: to link to the function, add parentheses
|
21 | /// [`stat`]: crate::os::linux::raw::stat()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We want the `struct`, so it's now prefixed accordingly.
rustdoc: do not use plain summary for trait impls
Fixes#38386.
Fixes#48332.
Fixes#49430.
Fixes#62741.
Fixes#73474.
Unfortunately this is not quite ready to go because the newly-working links trigger a bunch of linkcheck failures. The failures are tough to fix because the links are resolved relative to the implementor, which could be anywhere in the module hierarchy.
(In the current docs, these links end up rendering as uninterpreted markdown syntax, so I don't think these failures are any worse than the status quo. It might be acceptable to just add them to the linkchecker whitelist.)
Ideally this could be fixed with intra-doc links ~~but it isn't working for me: I am currently investigating if it's possible to solve it this way.~~ Opened #73829.
EDIT: This is now ready!
Add sanitizer support on FreeBSD
Restarting #47337. Everything is better now, no more weird llvm problems, well not everything:
Unfortunately, the sanitizers don't have proper support for versioned symbols (https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/628), so `libc`'s usage of `stat@FBSD_1.0` and so on explodes, e.g. in calling `std::fs::metadata`.
Building std (now easy thanks to cargo `-Zbuild-std`) and libc with `freebsd12/13` config via the `LIBC_CI=1` env variable is a good workaround…
```
LIBC_CI=1 RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=address" cargo +san-test -Zbuild-std run --target x86_64-unknown-freebsd --verbose
```
…*except* std won't build because there's no `st_lspare` in the ino64 version of the struct, so an std patch is required:
```diff
--- i/src/libstd/os/freebsd/fs.rs
+++ w/src/libstd/os/freebsd/fs.rs
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ pub trait MetadataExt {
fn st_flags(&self) -> u32;
#[stable(feature = "metadata_ext2", since = "1.8.0")]
fn st_gen(&self) -> u32;
- #[stable(feature = "metadata_ext2", since = "1.8.0")]
- fn st_lspare(&self) -> u32;
}
#[stable(feature = "metadata_ext", since = "1.1.0")]
@@ -136,7 +134,4 @@ impl MetadataExt for Metadata {
fn st_flags(&self) -> u32 {
self.as_inner().as_inner().st_flags as u32
}
- fn st_lspare(&self) -> u32 {
- self.as_inner().as_inner().st_lspare as u32
- }
}
```
I guess std could like.. detect that `libc` isn't built for the old ABI, and replace the implementation of `st_lspare` with a panic?
Unfortunately, sanitizers do not support versioned symbols[1],
so they break filesystem access via the legacy, pre-ino64 ABI.
To use sanitizers on FreeBSD >= 12, we need to build the libc
crate with LIBC_CI=1 to use the new ABI -- including the libc
used for std. But that removes the st_lspare field std was
expecting for the deprecated metadata extension.
Add a way to skip that field to allow the build to work.
[1]: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/628
