safe transmute: use Assume struct to provide analysis options

This was left as a TODO in #92268, and brings the trait more in
line with what was defined in MCP411.

`Assume::visibility` has been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as
library safety is what's actually being assumed; visibility is
just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (this may
change).

ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
This commit is contained in:
Jack Wrenn
2022-08-18 19:39:14 +00:00
parent e0dc8d7801
commit f46fffc276
77 changed files with 1321 additions and 721 deletions

View File

@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
#![warn(missing_debug_implementations)]
#![warn(missing_docs)]
#![allow(explicit_outlives_requirements)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
//
// Library features:
#![feature(const_align_offset)]
@@ -160,6 +161,7 @@
//
// Language features:
#![feature(abi_unadjusted)]
#![feature(adt_const_params)]
#![feature(allow_internal_unsafe)]
#![feature(allow_internal_unstable)]
#![feature(associated_type_bounds)]