safe transmute: use Assume struct to provide analysis options

This was left as a TODO in #92268, and brings the trait more in
line with what was defined in MCP411.

`Assume::visibility` has been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as
library safety is what's actually being assumed; visibility is
just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (this may
change).

ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571

compiler/rustc_transmute/src/maybe_transmutable/mod.rs

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ where
     #[inline(always)]
     #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), fields(src = ?self.src, dst = ?self.dst))]
     pub(crate) fn answer(self) -> Answer<<C as QueryContext>::Ref> {
-        let assume_visibility = self.assume.visibility;
+        let assume_visibility = self.assume.safety;
         let query_or_answer = self.map_layouts(|src, dst, scope, context| {
             // Remove all `Def` nodes from `src`, without checking their visibility.
             let src = src.prune(&|def| true);