rust-lang/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ImplTraitPlaceholder -> is_impl_trait_in_trait

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Santiago Pastorino
2023-03-14 18:28:48 -03:00
parent 39d19ca9f2
commit e41491fe05
10 changed files with 41 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/wfcheck.rs
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
use crate::autoderef::Autoderef;
use crate::constrained_generic_params::{identify_constrained_generic_params, Parameter};
use hir::def::DefKind;
use rustc_ast as ast;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet, FxIndexSet};
use rustc_errors::{pluralize, struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed};
@@ -1549,7 +1548,12 @@ fn check_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_bounds<'tcx>(
for arg in fn_output.walk() {
if let ty::GenericArgKind::Type(ty) = arg.unpack()
&& let ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, proj) = ty.kind()
&& tcx.def_kind(proj.def_id) == DefKind::ImplTraitPlaceholder
// FIXME(-Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty) we should just check
// `tcx.def_kind(proj.def_id) == DefKind::ImplTraitPlaceholder`. Right now
// `check_associated_type_bounds` is not called for RPITITs synthesized as
// associated types. See `check_mod_type_wf` to see how synthesized associated
// types are missed due to iterating over HIR.
&& tcx.is_impl_trait_in_trait(proj.def_id)
&& tcx.impl_trait_in_trait_parent_fn(proj.def_id) == fn_def_id.to_def_id()
{
let span = tcx.def_span(proj.def_id);