Consider outlives assumptions when proving auto traits for coroutine interiors

This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet
2025-07-13 20:43:29 +00:00
parent 3e7dfaa510
commit e3f643c706
29 changed files with 310 additions and 204 deletions

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
use rustc_hir::def_id::LocalDefId;
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::QueryRegionConstraints;
use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::RegionBoundPairs;
@@ -7,7 +8,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, SubregionOrigin};
use rustc_infer::traits::query::type_op::DeeplyNormalize;
use rustc_middle::bug;
use rustc_middle::ty::{
self, GenericArgKind, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitableExt, fold_regions,
self, GenericArgKind, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitableExt, elaborate, fold_regions,
};
use rustc_span::Span;
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::type_op::{TypeOp, TypeOpOutput};
@@ -70,10 +71,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub(super) fn convert_all(&mut self, query_constraints: &QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx>) {
let QueryRegionConstraints { outlives } = query_constraints;
let QueryRegionConstraints { outlives, assumptions } = query_constraints;
let assumptions =
elaborate::elaborate_outlives_assumptions(self.infcx.tcx, assumptions.iter().copied());
for &(predicate, constraint_category) in outlives {
self.convert(predicate, constraint_category);
self.convert(predicate, constraint_category, &assumptions);
}
}
@@ -112,7 +115,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
self.category = outlives_requirement.category;
self.span = outlives_requirement.blame_span;
self.convert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(subject, outlived_region), self.category);
self.convert(
ty::OutlivesPredicate(subject, outlived_region),
self.category,
&Default::default(),
);
}
(self.category, self.span, self.from_closure) = backup;
}
@@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
&mut self,
predicate: ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
constraint_category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
higher_ranked_assumptions: &FxHashSet<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
) {
let tcx = self.infcx.tcx;
debug!("generate: constraints at: {:#?}", self.locations);
@@ -150,7 +158,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
}
let mut next_outlives_predicates = vec![];
for (ty::OutlivesPredicate(k1, r2), constraint_category) in outlives_predicates {
for (pred, constraint_category) in outlives_predicates {
// Constraint is implied by a coroutine's well-formedness.
if higher_ranked_assumptions.contains(&pred) {
continue;
}
let ty::OutlivesPredicate(k1, r2) = pred;
match k1.kind() {
GenericArgKind::Lifetime(r1) => {
let r1_vid = self.to_region_vid(r1);
@@ -273,7 +287,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
match self.param_env.and(DeeplyNormalize { value: ty }).fully_perform(self.infcx, self.span)
{
Ok(TypeOpOutput { output: ty, constraints, .. }) => {
if let Some(QueryRegionConstraints { outlives }) = constraints {
// FIXME(higher_ranked_auto): What should we do with the assumptions here?
if let Some(QueryRegionConstraints { outlives, assumptions: _ }) = constraints {
next_outlives_predicates.extend(outlives.iter().copied());
}
ty

View File

@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ pub(crate) fn type_check<'tcx>(
pre_obligations.is_empty(),
"there should be no incoming region obligations = {pre_obligations:#?}",
);
let pre_assumptions = infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions();
assert!(
pre_assumptions.is_empty(),
"there should be no incoming region assumptions = {pre_assumptions:#?}",
);
debug!(?normalized_inputs_and_output);

View File

@@ -116,9 +116,15 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
}
let region_obligations = self.take_registered_region_obligations();
let region_assumptions = self.take_registered_region_assumptions();
debug!(?region_obligations);
let region_constraints = self.with_region_constraints(|region_constraints| {
make_query_region_constraints(tcx, region_obligations, region_constraints)
make_query_region_constraints(
tcx,
region_obligations,
region_constraints,
region_assumptions,
)
});
debug!(?region_constraints);
@@ -169,6 +175,11 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
self.register_outlives_constraint(predicate, cause);
}
for assumption in &query_response.value.region_constraints.assumptions {
let assumption = instantiate_value(self.tcx, &result_args, *assumption);
self.register_region_assumption(assumption);
}
let user_result: R =
query_response.instantiate_projected(self.tcx, &result_args, |q_r| q_r.value.clone());
@@ -292,6 +303,18 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
}),
);
// FIXME(higher_ranked_auto): Optimize this to instantiate all assumptions
// at once, rather than calling `instantiate_value` repeatedly which may
// create more universes.
output_query_region_constraints.assumptions.extend(
query_response
.value
.region_constraints
.assumptions
.iter()
.map(|&r_c| instantiate_value(self.tcx, &result_args, r_c)),
);
let user_result: R =
query_response.instantiate_projected(self.tcx, &result_args, |q_r| q_r.value.clone());
@@ -567,6 +590,7 @@ pub fn make_query_region_constraints<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
outlives_obligations: Vec<TypeOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>,
region_constraints: &RegionConstraintData<'tcx>,
assumptions: Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
) -> QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx> {
let RegionConstraintData { constraints, verifys } = region_constraints;
@@ -602,5 +626,5 @@ pub fn make_query_region_constraints<'tcx>(
}))
.collect();
QueryRegionConstraints { outlives }
QueryRegionConstraints { outlives, assumptions }
}

View File

@@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ pub struct InferCtxtInner<'tcx> {
/// that all type inference variables have been bound and so forth.
region_obligations: Vec<TypeOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>,
/// The outlives bounds that we assume must hold about placeholders that
/// come from instantiating the binder of coroutine-witnesses. These bounds
/// are deduced from the well-formedness of the witness's types, and are
/// necessary because of the way we anonymize the regions in a coroutine,
/// which may cause types to no longer be considered well-formed.
region_assumptions: Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
/// Caches for opaque type inference.
opaque_type_storage: OpaqueTypeStorage<'tcx>,
}
@@ -164,7 +171,8 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtInner<'tcx> {
int_unification_storage: Default::default(),
float_unification_storage: Default::default(),
region_constraint_storage: Some(Default::default()),
region_obligations: vec![],
region_obligations: Default::default(),
region_assumptions: Default::default(),
opaque_type_storage: Default::default(),
}
}
@@ -174,6 +182,11 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtInner<'tcx> {
&self.region_obligations
}
#[inline]
pub fn region_assumptions(&self) -> &[ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>] {
&self.region_assumptions
}
#[inline]
pub fn projection_cache(&mut self) -> traits::ProjectionCache<'_, 'tcx> {
self.projection_cache.with_log(&mut self.undo_log)

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashSet, FxIndexSet};
use rustc_data_structures::transitive_relation::TransitiveRelationBuilder;
use rustc_middle::{bug, ty};
use tracing::debug;
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ pub struct OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
/// optimized in the future, though.
region_bound_pairs: RegionBoundPairs<'tcx>,
known_type_outlives: Vec<ty::PolyTypeOutlivesPredicate<'tcx>>,
/// Assumptions that come from the well-formedness of coroutines that we prove
/// auto trait bounds for during the type checking of this body.
higher_ranked_assumptions: FxHashSet<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
}
/// "Region-bound pairs" tracks outlives relations that are known to
@@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
known_type_outlives: Vec<ty::PolyTypeOutlivesPredicate<'tcx>>,
extra_bounds: impl IntoIterator<Item = OutlivesBound<'tcx>>,
higher_ranked_assumptions: FxHashSet<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
) -> Self {
let mut region_relation = TransitiveRelationBuilder::default();
let mut region_bound_pairs = RegionBoundPairs::default();
@@ -88,6 +92,7 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
known_type_outlives,
free_region_map: FreeRegionMap { relation: region_relation.freeze() },
region_bound_pairs,
higher_ranked_assumptions,
}
}
@@ -102,4 +107,10 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
pub fn known_type_outlives(&self) -> &[ty::PolyTypeOutlivesPredicate<'tcx>] {
&self.known_type_outlives
}
pub fn higher_ranked_assumptions(
&self,
) -> &FxHashSet<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>> {
&self.higher_ranked_assumptions
}
}

View File

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ use super::region_constraints::{RegionConstraintData, UndoLog};
use super::{InferCtxt, RegionResolutionError, SubregionOrigin};
use crate::infer::free_regions::RegionRelations;
use crate::infer::lexical_region_resolve;
use crate::infer::region_constraints::Constraint;
pub mod env;
pub mod for_liveness;
@@ -54,18 +55,27 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
}
};
let storage = {
let mut storage = {
let mut inner = self.inner.borrow_mut();
let inner = &mut *inner;
assert!(
self.tainted_by_errors().is_some() || inner.region_obligations.is_empty(),
"region_obligations not empty: {:#?}",
inner.region_obligations
inner.region_obligations,
);
assert!(!UndoLogs::<UndoLog<'_>>::in_snapshot(&inner.undo_log));
inner.region_constraint_storage.take().expect("regions already resolved")
};
// Filter out any region-region outlives assumptions that are implied by
// coroutine well-formedness.
storage.data.constraints.retain(|(constraint, _)| match *constraint {
Constraint::RegSubReg(r1, r2) => !outlives_env
.higher_ranked_assumptions()
.contains(&ty::OutlivesPredicate(r2.into(), r1)),
_ => true,
});
let region_rels = &RegionRelations::new(self.tcx, outlives_env.free_region_map());
let (lexical_region_resolutions, errors) =
@@ -93,6 +103,11 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
"region_obligations not empty: {:#?}",
self.inner.borrow().region_obligations
);
assert!(
self.inner.borrow().region_assumptions.is_empty(),
"region_assumptions not empty: {:#?}",
self.inner.borrow().region_assumptions
);
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().take_and_reset_data()
}

View File

@@ -170,6 +170,21 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
std::mem::take(&mut self.inner.borrow_mut().region_obligations)
}
pub fn register_region_assumption(
&self,
assumption: ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
) {
let mut inner = self.inner.borrow_mut();
inner.undo_log.push(UndoLog::PushRegionAssumption);
inner.region_assumptions.push(assumption);
}
pub fn take_registered_region_assumptions(
&self,
) -> Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>> {
std::mem::take(&mut self.inner.borrow_mut().region_assumptions)
}
/// Process the region obligations that must be proven (during
/// `regionck`) for the given `body_id`, given information about
/// the region bounds in scope and so forth.
@@ -220,6 +235,13 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
let (sup_type, sub_region) =
(sup_type, sub_region).fold_with(&mut OpportunisticRegionResolver::new(self));
if outlives_env
.higher_ranked_assumptions()
.contains(&ty::OutlivesPredicate(sup_type.into(), sub_region))
{
continue;
}
debug!(?sup_type, ?sub_region, ?origin);
let outlives = &mut TypeOutlives::new(

View File

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ pub(crate) enum UndoLog<'tcx> {
RegionUnificationTable(sv::UndoLog<ut::Delegate<RegionVidKey<'tcx>>>),
ProjectionCache(traits::UndoLog<'tcx>),
PushTypeOutlivesConstraint,
PushRegionAssumption,
}
macro_rules! impl_from {
@@ -77,6 +78,9 @@ impl<'tcx> Rollback<UndoLog<'tcx>> for InferCtxtInner<'tcx> {
let popped = self.region_obligations.pop();
assert_matches!(popped, Some(_), "pushed region constraint but could not pop it");
}
UndoLog::PushRegionAssumption => {
self.region_assumptions.pop();
}
}
}
}

View File

@@ -81,13 +81,18 @@ pub struct QueryResponse<'tcx, R> {
#[derive(HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx> {
pub outlives: Vec<QueryOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>,
pub assumptions: Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
}
impl QueryRegionConstraints<'_> {
/// Represents an empty (trivially true) set of region
/// constraints.
/// Represents an empty (trivially true) set of region constraints.
///
/// FIXME(higher_ranked_auto): This could still just be true if there are only assumptions?
/// Because I don't expect for us to get cases where an assumption from one query would
/// discharge a requirement from another query, which is a potential problem if we did throw
/// away these assumptions because there were no constraints.
pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
self.outlives.is_empty()
self.outlives.is_empty() && self.assumptions.is_empty()
}
}

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, RegionResolutionError};
use rustc_macros::extension;
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, elaborate};
use crate::traits::ScrubbedTraitError;
use crate::traits::outlives_bounds::InferCtxtExt;
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
}
}
// FIXME(-Znext-trait-solver): Normalize these.
let higher_ranked_assumptions = infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions();
let higher_ranked_assumptions =
elaborate::elaborate_outlives_assumptions(infcx.tcx, higher_ranked_assumptions);
// FIXME: This needs to be modified so that we normalize the known type
// outlives obligations then elaborate them into their region/type components.
// Otherwise, `<W<'a> as Mirror>::Assoc: 'b` will not imply `'a: 'b` even
@@ -59,6 +64,7 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx> {
assumed_wf_tys,
disable_implied_bounds_hack,
),
higher_ranked_assumptions,
)
}
}

View File

@@ -212,8 +212,14 @@ impl<'tcx> rustc_next_trait_solver::delegate::SolverDelegate for SolverDelegate<
// Cannot use `take_registered_region_obligations` as we may compute the response
// inside of a `probe` whenever we have multiple choices inside of the solver.
let region_obligations = self.0.inner.borrow().region_obligations().to_owned();
let region_assumptions = self.0.inner.borrow().region_assumptions().to_owned();
let region_constraints = self.0.with_region_constraints(|region_constraints| {
make_query_region_constraints(self.tcx, region_obligations, region_constraints)
make_query_region_constraints(
self.tcx,
region_obligations,
region_constraints,
region_assumptions,
)
});
let mut seen = FxHashSet::default();

View File

@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ fn impl_intersection_has_negative_obligation(
// requirements, when proving the negated where clauses below.
drop(equate_obligations);
drop(infcx.take_registered_region_obligations());
drop(infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions());
drop(infcx.take_and_reset_region_constraints());
plug_infer_with_placeholders(

View File

@@ -78,7 +78,10 @@ fn implied_outlives_bounds<'a, 'tcx>(
bounds.retain(|bound| !bound.has_placeholders());
if !constraints.is_empty() {
let QueryRegionConstraints { outlives } = constraints;
// FIXME(higher_ranked_auto): Should we register assumptions here?
// We otherwise would get spurious errors if normalizing an implied
// outlives bound required proving some higher-ranked coroutine obl.
let QueryRegionConstraints { outlives, assumptions: _ } = constraints;
let cause = ObligationCause::misc(span, body_id);
for &(predicate, _) in &outlives {
infcx.register_outlives_constraint(predicate, &cause);

View File

@@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ where
pre_obligations.is_empty(),
"scrape_region_constraints: incoming region obligations = {pre_obligations:#?}",
);
let pre_assumptions = infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions();
assert!(
pre_assumptions.is_empty(),
"scrape_region_constraints: incoming region assumptions = {pre_assumptions:#?}",
);
let value = infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
@@ -100,11 +105,13 @@ where
let value = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(value);
let region_obligations = infcx.take_registered_region_obligations();
let region_assumptions = infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions();
let region_constraint_data = infcx.take_and_reset_region_constraints();
let region_constraints = query_response::make_query_region_constraints(
infcx.tcx,
region_obligations,
&region_constraint_data,
region_assumptions,
);
if region_constraints.is_empty() {

View File

@@ -180,8 +180,9 @@ where
span,
)?;
output.error_info = error_info;
if let Some(QueryRegionConstraints { outlives }) = output.constraints {
if let Some(QueryRegionConstraints { outlives, assumptions }) = output.constraints {
region_constraints.outlives.extend(outlives.iter().cloned());
region_constraints.assumptions.extend(assumptions.iter().cloned());
}
output.constraints = if region_constraints.is_empty() {
None

View File

@@ -411,18 +411,33 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
obligation.predicate.self_ty().map_bound(|ty| self.infcx.shallow_resolve(ty));
let self_ty = self.infcx.enter_forall_and_leak_universe(self_ty);
let types = self.constituent_types_for_ty(self_ty)?;
let types = self.infcx.enter_forall_and_leak_universe(types);
let constituents = self.constituent_types_for_auto_trait(self_ty)?;
let constituents = self.infcx.enter_forall_and_leak_universe(constituents);
let cause = obligation.derived_cause(ObligationCauseCode::BuiltinDerived);
let obligations = self.collect_predicates_for_types(
let mut obligations = self.collect_predicates_for_types(
obligation.param_env,
cause,
cause.clone(),
obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
obligation.predicate.def_id(),
types,
constituents.types,
);
// FIXME(coroutine_clone): We could uplift this into `collect_predicates_for_types`
// and do this for `Copy`/`Clone` too, but that's feature-gated so it doesn't really
// matter yet.
for assumption in constituents.assumptions {
let assumption = normalize_with_depth_to(
self,
obligation.param_env,
cause.clone(),
obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
assumption,
&mut obligations,
);
self.infcx.register_region_assumption(assumption);
}
Ok(obligations)
})
}

View File

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::DefineOpaqueTypes;
use rustc_infer::infer::at::ToTrace;
use rustc_infer::infer::relate::TypeRelation;
use rustc_infer::traits::{PredicateObligations, TraitObligation};
use rustc_macros::{TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable};
use rustc_middle::bug;
use rustc_middle::dep_graph::{DepNodeIndex, dep_kinds};
pub use rustc_middle::traits::select::*;
@@ -2247,10 +2248,10 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
/// Zed<i32> where enum Zed { A(T), B(u32) } -> [i32, u32]
/// ```
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
fn constituent_types_for_ty(
fn constituent_types_for_auto_trait(
&self,
t: Ty<'tcx>,
) -> Result<ty::Binder<'tcx, Vec<Ty<'tcx>>>, SelectionError<'tcx>> {
) -> Result<ty::Binder<'tcx, AutoImplConstituents<'tcx>>, SelectionError<'tcx>> {
Ok(match *t.kind() {
ty::Uint(_)
| ty::Int(_)
@@ -2261,17 +2262,26 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
| ty::Error(_)
| ty::Infer(ty::IntVar(_) | ty::FloatVar(_))
| ty::Never
| ty::Char => ty::Binder::dummy(Vec::new()),
| ty::Char => {
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![], assumptions: vec![] })
}
// This branch is only for `experimental_default_bounds`.
// Other foreign types were rejected earlier in
// `assemble_candidates_from_auto_impls`.
ty::Foreign(..) => ty::Binder::dummy(Vec::new()),
ty::Foreign(..) => {
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![], assumptions: vec![] })
}
ty::UnsafeBinder(ty) => ty.map_bound(|ty| vec![ty]),
ty::UnsafeBinder(ty) => {
ty.map_bound(|ty| AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![ty], assumptions: vec![] })
}
// Treat this like `struct str([u8]);`
ty::Str => ty::Binder::dummy(vec![Ty::new_slice(self.tcx(), self.tcx().types.u8)]),
ty::Str => ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: vec![Ty::new_slice(self.tcx(), self.tcx().types.u8)],
assumptions: vec![],
}),
ty::Placeholder(..)
| ty::Dynamic(..)
@@ -2283,30 +2293,41 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
}
ty::RawPtr(element_ty, _) | ty::Ref(_, element_ty, _) => {
ty::Binder::dummy(vec![element_ty])
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: vec![element_ty],
assumptions: vec![],
})
}
ty::Pat(ty, _) | ty::Array(ty, _) | ty::Slice(ty) => ty::Binder::dummy(vec![ty]),
ty::Pat(ty, _) | ty::Array(ty, _) | ty::Slice(ty) => {
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![ty], assumptions: vec![] })
}
ty::Tuple(tys) => {
// (T1, ..., Tn) -- meets any bound that all of T1...Tn meet
ty::Binder::dummy(tys.iter().collect())
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: tys.iter().collect(),
assumptions: vec![],
})
}
ty::Closure(_, args) => {
let ty = self.infcx.shallow_resolve(args.as_closure().tupled_upvars_ty());
ty::Binder::dummy(vec![ty])
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![ty], assumptions: vec![] })
}
ty::CoroutineClosure(_, args) => {
let ty = self.infcx.shallow_resolve(args.as_coroutine_closure().tupled_upvars_ty());
ty::Binder::dummy(vec![ty])
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents { types: vec![ty], assumptions: vec![] })
}
ty::Coroutine(_, args) => {
let ty = self.infcx.shallow_resolve(args.as_coroutine().tupled_upvars_ty());
let witness = args.as_coroutine().witness();
ty::Binder::dummy([ty].into_iter().chain(iter::once(witness)).collect())
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: [ty].into_iter().chain(iter::once(witness)).collect(),
assumptions: vec![],
})
}
ty::CoroutineWitness(def_id, args) => self
@@ -2314,16 +2335,23 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
.tcx
.coroutine_hidden_types(def_id)
.instantiate(self.infcx.tcx, args)
.map_bound(|witness| witness.types.to_vec()),
.map_bound(|witness| AutoImplConstituents {
types: witness.types.to_vec(),
assumptions: witness.assumptions.to_vec(),
}),
// For `PhantomData<T>`, we pass `T`.
ty::Adt(def, args) if def.is_phantom_data() => {
ty::Binder::dummy(args.types().collect())
ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: args.types().collect(),
assumptions: vec![],
})
}
ty::Adt(def, args) => {
ty::Binder::dummy(def.all_fields().map(|f| f.ty(self.tcx(), args)).collect())
}
ty::Adt(def, args) => ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: def.all_fields().map(|f| f.ty(self.tcx(), args)).collect(),
assumptions: vec![],
}),
ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ty::AliasTy { def_id, args, .. }) => {
if self.infcx.can_define_opaque_ty(def_id) {
@@ -2333,7 +2361,10 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
// which enforces a DAG between the functions requiring
// the auto trait bounds in question.
match self.tcx().type_of_opaque(def_id) {
Ok(ty) => ty::Binder::dummy(vec![ty.instantiate(self.tcx(), args)]),
Ok(ty) => ty::Binder::dummy(AutoImplConstituents {
types: vec![ty.instantiate(self.tcx(), args)],
assumptions: vec![],
}),
Err(_) => {
return Err(SelectionError::OpaqueTypeAutoTraitLeakageUnknown(def_id));
}
@@ -3113,3 +3144,9 @@ pub(crate) enum ProjectionMatchesProjection {
Ambiguous,
No,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub(crate) struct AutoImplConstituents<'tcx> {
pub types: Vec<Ty<'tcx>>,
pub assumptions: Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<'tcx, ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>>,
}

View File

@@ -66,12 +66,14 @@ fn compute_assumptions<'tcx>(
let _errors = ocx.select_all_or_error();
let region_obligations = infcx.take_registered_region_obligations();
let region_assumptions = infcx.take_registered_region_assumptions();
let region_constraints = infcx.take_and_reset_region_constraints();
let outlives = make_query_region_constraints(
tcx,
region_obligations,
&region_constraints,
region_assumptions,
)
.outlives
.fold_with(&mut OpportunisticRegionResolver::new(&infcx));

View File

@@ -368,3 +368,54 @@ impl<I: Interner, It: Iterator<Item = I::Clause>> Iterator for FilterToTraits<I,
(0, upper)
}
}
pub fn elaborate_outlives_assumptions<I: Interner>(
cx: I,
assumptions: impl IntoIterator<Item = ty::OutlivesPredicate<I, I::GenericArg>>,
) -> HashSet<ty::OutlivesPredicate<I, I::GenericArg>> {
let mut collected = HashSet::default();
for ty::OutlivesPredicate(arg1, r2) in assumptions {
collected.insert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(arg1, r2));
match arg1.kind() {
// Elaborate the components of an type, since we may have substituted a
// generic coroutine with a more specific type.
ty::GenericArgKind::Type(ty1) => {
let mut components = smallvec![];
push_outlives_components(cx, ty1, &mut components);
for c in components {
match c {
Component::Region(r1) => {
if !r1.is_bound() {
collected.insert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r1.into(), r2));
}
}
Component::Param(p) => {
let ty = Ty::new_param(cx, p);
collected.insert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty.into(), r2));
}
Component::Placeholder(p) => {
let ty = Ty::new_placeholder(cx, p);
collected.insert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty.into(), r2));
}
Component::Alias(alias_ty) => {
collected.insert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(alias_ty.to_ty(cx).into(), r2));
}
Component::UnresolvedInferenceVariable(_) | Component::EscapingAlias(_) => {
}
}
}
}
// Nothing to elaborate for a region.
ty::GenericArgKind::Lifetime(_) => {}
// Consts don't really participate in outlives.
ty::GenericArgKind::Const(_) => {}
}
}
collected
}

View File

@@ -1021,7 +1021,6 @@ ui/foreign/issue-91370-foreign-fn-block-impl.rs
ui/foreign/issue-99276-same-type-lifetimes.rs
ui/function-pointer/issue-102289.rs
ui/functions-closures/closure-expected-type/issue-38714.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-100013.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-80626.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-87735.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-87755.rs
@@ -1099,7 +1098,6 @@ ui/generic-associated-types/issue-90729.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-91139.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-91883.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-92033.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-92096.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-92280.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-92954.rs
ui/generic-associated-types/issue-93141.rs

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
//@ incremental
//@ edition: 2021
//@ check-pass
use std::future::*;
use std::marker::PhantomData;
@@ -96,8 +97,6 @@ impl<St: ?Sized + Stream + Unpin> Future for Next<'_, St> {
fn main() {
send(async {
//~^ ERROR implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
//~| ERROR implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
Next(&Buffered(Map(Empty(PhantomData), ready::<&()>), FuturesOrdered(PhantomData), 0)).await
});
}

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
--> $DIR/drop-tracking-unresolved-typeck-results.rs:98:5
|
LL | / send(async {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | Next(&Buffered(Map(Empty(PhantomData), ready::<&()>), FuturesOrdered(PhantomData), 0)).await
LL | | });
| |______^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
= note: `fn(&'0 ()) -> std::future::Ready<&'0 ()> {std::future::ready::<&'0 ()>}` must implement `FnOnce<(&'1 (),)>`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&(),)>`
error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
--> $DIR/drop-tracking-unresolved-typeck-results.rs:98:5
|
LL | / send(async {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | Next(&Buffered(Map(Empty(PhantomData), ready::<&()>), FuturesOrdered(PhantomData), 0)).await
LL | | });
| |______^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
= note: `fn(&'0 ()) -> std::future::Ready<&'0 ()> {std::future::ready::<&'0 ()>}` must implement `FnOnce<(&'1 (),)>`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&(),)>`
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
//@ edition: 2021
//@ known-bug: #110963
//@ check-pass
#![feature(return_type_notation)]

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> $DIR/issue-110963-early.rs:14:5
|
LL | / spawn(async move {
LL | | let mut hc = hc;
LL | | if !hc.check().await {
LL | | log_health_check_failure().await;
LL | | }
LL | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `impl Future<Output = bool> { <HC as HealthCheck>::check<'0>(..) }`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `impl Future<Output = bool> { <HC as HealthCheck>::check<'2>(..) }`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> $DIR/issue-110963-early.rs:14:5
|
LL | / spawn(async move {
LL | | let mut hc = hc;
LL | | if !hc.check().await {
LL | | log_health_check_failure().await;
LL | | }
LL | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `impl Future<Output = bool> { <HC as HealthCheck>::check<'0>(..) }`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `impl Future<Output = bool> { <HC as HealthCheck>::check<'2>(..) }`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

View File

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
error: lifetime bound not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-100013.rs:15:5
|
LL | / async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
LL | | let x = None::<I::Future<'_, '_>>; // a type referencing GAT
LL | | async {}.await; // a yield point
LL | | }
| |_____^
|
= note: this is a known limitation that will be removed in the future (see issue #100013 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100013> for more information)
error: lifetime bound not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-100013.rs:22:5
|
LL | / async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
LL | | let x = None::<I::Future<'a, 'b>>; // a type referencing GAT
LL | | async {}.await; // a yield point
LL | | }
| |_____^
|
= note: this is a known limitation that will be removed in the future (see issue #100013 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100013> for more information)
error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> $DIR/issue-100013.rs:23:17
|
LL | fn call2<'a, 'b, I: FutureIterator>() -> impl Send {
| -- -- lifetime `'b` defined here
| |
| lifetime `'a` defined here
LL | async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
LL | let x = None::<I::Future<'a, 'b>>; // a type referencing GAT
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ requires that `'a` must outlive `'b`
|
= help: consider adding the following bound: `'a: 'b`
error: lifetime bound not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-100013.rs:29:5
|
LL | / async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
LL | | let x = None::<I::Future<'a, 'b>>; // a type referencing GAT
LL | | async {}.await; // a yield point
LL | | }
| |_____^
|
= note: this is a known limitation that will be removed in the future (see issue #100013 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100013> for more information)
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
//@ check-fail
//@ known-bug: #100013
//@ check-pass
//@ edition: 2021
// We really should accept this, but we need implied bounds between the regions
// in a coroutine interior.
pub trait FutureIterator {
type Future<'s, 'cx>: Send
where
@@ -18,14 +14,7 @@ fn call<I: FutureIterator>() -> impl Send {
}
}
fn call2<'a, 'b, I: FutureIterator>() -> impl Send {
async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
let x = None::<I::Future<'a, 'b>>; // a type referencing GAT
async {}.await; // a yield point
}
}
fn call3<'a: 'b, 'b, I: FutureIterator>() -> impl Send {
fn call2<'a: 'b, 'b, I: FutureIterator>() -> impl Send {
async { // a coroutine checked for autotrait impl `Send`
let x = None::<I::Future<'a, 'b>>; // a type referencing GAT
async {}.await; // a yield point

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
//@ edition:2018
//@ check-pass
use std::future::Future;
trait Client {
type Connecting<'a>: Future + Send
where
Self: 'a;
fn connect(&'_ self) -> Self::Connecting<'_>;
}
fn call_connect<C>(c: &'_ C) -> impl '_ + Future + Send
where
C: Client + Send + Sync,
{
async move { c.connect().await }
}
fn main() {}

View File

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
//@ edition:2018
use std::future::Future;
trait Client {
type Connecting<'a>: Future + Send
where
Self: 'a;
fn connect(&'_ self) -> Self::Connecting<'_>;
}
fn call_connect<C>(c: &'_ C) -> impl '_ + Future + Send
where
C: Client + Send + Sync,
{
async move { c.connect().await }
//~^ ERROR `C` does not live long enough
//
// FIXME(#71723). This is because we infer at some point a value of
//
// impl Future<Output = <C as Client>::Connection<'_>>
//
// and then we somehow fail the WF check because `where C: 'a` is not known,
// but I'm not entirely sure how that comes about.
}
fn main() {}

View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
error: `C` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/issue-92096.rs:17:5
|
LL | async move { c.connect().await }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 1 previous error