swap_simple no longer needs to be a separate function
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1062,11 +1062,26 @@ const unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping_simple_untyped<T>(x: *mut T, y: *mut T, coun
|
||||
let mut i = 0;
|
||||
while i < count {
|
||||
// SAFETY: By precondition, `i` is in-bounds because it's below `n`
|
||||
let x = unsafe { &mut *x.add(i) };
|
||||
let x = unsafe { x.add(i) };
|
||||
// SAFETY: By precondition, `i` is in-bounds because it's below `n`
|
||||
// and it's distinct from `x` since the ranges are non-overlapping
|
||||
let y = unsafe { &mut *y.add(i) };
|
||||
mem::swap_simple::<MaybeUninit<T>>(x, y);
|
||||
let y = unsafe { y.add(i) };
|
||||
|
||||
// If we end up here, it's because we're using a simple type -- like
|
||||
// a small power-of-two-sized thing -- or a special type with particularly
|
||||
// large alignment, particularly SIMD types.
|
||||
// Thus we're fine just reading-and-writing it, as either it's small
|
||||
// and that works well anyway or it's special and the type's author
|
||||
// presumably wanted things to be done in the larger chunk.
|
||||
|
||||
// SAFETY: we're only ever given pointers that are valid to read/write,
|
||||
// including being aligned, and nothing here panics so it's drop-safe.
|
||||
unsafe {
|
||||
let a: MaybeUninit<T> = read(x);
|
||||
let b: MaybeUninit<T> = read(y);
|
||||
write(x, b);
|
||||
write(y, a);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
i += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user