Rollup merge of #148218 - apiraino:update-prio-zulip-mesgs, r=Urgau,jieyouxu

Update T-compiler/ops Zulip messages

Slightly reword the issue prioritization and beta backport Zulip messages

r? `@jieyouxu` wdyt? (we discussed together this wording)
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger
2025-10-29 12:57:05 +01:00
committed by GitHub

View File

@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ trigger_files = [
zulip_stream = 245100 # #t-compiler/prioritization/alerts
topic = "#{number} {title}"
message_on_add = """\
@*WG-prioritization/alerts* issue #{number} has been requested for prioritization.
Issue #{number} has been requested for prioritization.
# [Procedure](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/prioritization.html)
- Priority?
@@ -738,12 +738,12 @@ message_on_reopen = "PR #{number} has been reopened. Pinging @*T-rustdoc*."
[notify-zulip."beta-nominated".compiler]
required_labels = ["T-compiler"]
zulip_stream = 474880 # #t-compiler/backports
topic = "#{number}: beta-backport nomination"
topic = "#{number}: beta-nominated"
message_on_add = [
"""\
PR #{number} "{title}" fixes a regression.
{recipients}, please evaluate nominating this PR for backport.
The following poll is a vibe-check and not binding.
PR #{number} "{title}" fixes a regression and has been nominated for backport.
{recipients}, what do you think about it?
This topic will help T-compiler getting context about it.
""",
"""\
/poll Should #{number} be beta backported?
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ message_on_remove = "PR #{number}'s beta-nomination has been removed."
[notify-zulip."beta-accepted".compiler]
required_labels = ["T-compiler"]
zulip_stream = 474880 # #t-compiler/backports
# Put it in the same thread as beta-nominated.
# Put it in the same Zulip topic as beta-nominated.
topic = "#{number}: beta-nominated"
message_on_add = "PR #{number} has been **accepted** for **beta** backport."