Move check_mod_impl_wf query call out of track_errors and bubble errors up instead.

This commit is contained in:
Oli Scherer
2024-01-11 22:13:39 +00:00
parent 4db93c5750
commit b1ce8a4ecd
7 changed files with 160 additions and 72 deletions

View File

@@ -82,10 +82,14 @@ use rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting::TypeErrCtxtExt;
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::outlives_bounds::InferCtxtExt as _;
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{self, translate_args_with_cause, wf, ObligationCtxt};
pub(super) fn check_min_specialization(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl_def_id: LocalDefId) {
pub(super) fn check_min_specialization(
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
if let Some(node) = parent_specialization_node(tcx, impl_def_id) {
check_always_applicable(tcx, impl_def_id, node);
check_always_applicable(tcx, impl_def_id, node)?;
}
Ok(())
}
fn parent_specialization_node(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId) -> Option<Node> {
@@ -109,42 +113,58 @@ fn parent_specialization_node(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId) -> Opti
/// Check that `impl1` is a sound specialization
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))]
fn check_always_applicable(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId, impl2_node: Node) {
fn check_always_applicable(
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
impl1_def_id: LocalDefId,
impl2_node: Node,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
let span = tcx.def_span(impl1_def_id);
check_has_items(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node, span);
let mut res = check_has_items(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node, span);
if let Ok((impl1_args, impl2_args)) = get_impl_args(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node) {
let impl2_def_id = impl2_node.def_id();
debug!(?impl2_def_id, ?impl2_args);
let (impl1_args, impl2_args) = get_impl_args(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node)?;
let impl2_def_id = impl2_node.def_id();
debug!(?impl2_def_id, ?impl2_args);
let parent_args = if impl2_node.is_from_trait() {
impl2_args.to_vec()
} else {
unconstrained_parent_impl_args(tcx, impl2_def_id, impl2_args)
};
let parent_args = if impl2_node.is_from_trait() {
impl2_args.to_vec()
} else {
unconstrained_parent_impl_args(tcx, impl2_def_id, impl2_args)
};
check_constness(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node, span);
check_static_lifetimes(tcx, &parent_args, span);
check_duplicate_params(tcx, impl1_args, &parent_args, span);
check_predicates(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl1_args, impl2_node, impl2_args, span);
}
res = res.and(check_constness(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_node, span));
res = res.and(check_static_lifetimes(tcx, &parent_args, span));
res = res.and(check_duplicate_params(tcx, impl1_args, &parent_args, span));
res = res.and(check_predicates(tcx, impl1_def_id, impl1_args, impl2_node, impl2_args, span));
res
}
fn check_has_items(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId, impl2_node: Node, span: Span) {
fn check_has_items(
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
impl1_def_id: LocalDefId,
impl2_node: Node,
span: Span,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
if let Node::Impl(impl2_id) = impl2_node
&& tcx.associated_item_def_ids(impl1_def_id).is_empty()
{
let base_impl_span = tcx.def_span(impl2_id);
tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::EmptySpecialization { span, base_impl_span });
return Err(tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::EmptySpecialization { span, base_impl_span }));
}
Ok(())
}
/// Check that the specializing impl `impl1` is at least as const as the base
/// impl `impl2`
fn check_constness(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId, impl2_node: Node, span: Span) {
fn check_constness(
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
impl1_def_id: LocalDefId,
impl2_node: Node,
span: Span,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
if impl2_node.is_from_trait() {
// This isn't a specialization
return;
return Ok(());
}
let impl1_constness = tcx.constness(impl1_def_id.to_def_id());
@@ -152,9 +172,10 @@ fn check_constness(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, impl1_def_id: LocalDefId, impl2_node: Node,
if let hir::Constness::Const = impl2_constness {
if let hir::Constness::NotConst = impl1_constness {
tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ConstSpecialize { span });
return Err(tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ConstSpecialize { span }));
}
}
Ok(())
}
/// Given a specializing impl `impl1`, and the base impl `impl2`, returns two
@@ -290,15 +311,17 @@ fn check_duplicate_params<'tcx>(
impl1_args: GenericArgsRef<'tcx>,
parent_args: &Vec<GenericArg<'tcx>>,
span: Span,
) {
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut base_params = cgp::parameters_for(parent_args, true);
base_params.sort_by_key(|param| param.0);
if let (_, [duplicate, ..]) = base_params.partition_dedup() {
let param = impl1_args[duplicate.0 as usize];
tcx.dcx()
return Err(tcx
.dcx()
.struct_span_err(span, format!("specializing impl repeats parameter `{param}`"))
.emit();
.emit());
}
Ok(())
}
/// Check that `'static` lifetimes are not introduced by the specializing impl.
@@ -313,10 +336,11 @@ fn check_static_lifetimes<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
parent_args: &Vec<GenericArg<'tcx>>,
span: Span,
) {
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
if tcx.any_free_region_meets(parent_args, |r| r.is_static()) {
tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::StaticSpecialize { span });
return Err(tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::StaticSpecialize { span }));
}
Ok(())
}
/// Check whether predicates on the specializing impl (`impl1`) are allowed.
@@ -337,7 +361,7 @@ fn check_predicates<'tcx>(
impl2_node: Node,
impl2_args: GenericArgsRef<'tcx>,
span: Span,
) {
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
let impl1_predicates: Vec<_> = traits::elaborate(
tcx,
tcx.predicates_of(impl1_def_id).instantiate(tcx, impl1_args).into_iter(),
@@ -399,14 +423,16 @@ fn check_predicates<'tcx>(
}
impl2_predicates.extend(traits::elaborate(tcx, always_applicable_traits));
let mut res = Ok(());
for (clause, span) in impl1_predicates {
if !impl2_predicates
.iter()
.any(|pred2| trait_predicates_eq(tcx, clause.as_predicate(), *pred2, span))
{
check_specialization_on(tcx, clause, span)
res = res.and(check_specialization_on(tcx, clause, span))
}
}
res
}
/// Checks if some predicate on the specializing impl (`predicate1`) is the same
@@ -443,19 +469,26 @@ fn trait_predicates_eq<'tcx>(
}
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))]
fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>, span: Span) {
fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>,
span: Span,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
match clause.kind().skip_binder() {
// Global predicates are either always true or always false, so we
// are fine to specialize on.
_ if clause.is_global() => (),
_ if clause.is_global() => Ok(()),
// We allow specializing on explicitly marked traits with no associated
// items.
ty::ClauseKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate { trait_ref, polarity: _ }) => {
if !matches!(
if matches!(
trait_specialization_kind(tcx, clause),
Some(TraitSpecializationKind::Marker)
) {
tcx.dcx()
Ok(())
} else {
Err(tcx
.dcx()
.struct_span_err(
span,
format!(
@@ -463,17 +496,16 @@ fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>, sp
tcx.def_path_str(trait_ref.def_id),
),
)
.emit();
.emit())
}
}
ty::ClauseKind::Projection(ty::ProjectionPredicate { projection_ty, term }) => {
tcx.dcx()
.struct_span_err(
span,
format!("cannot specialize on associated type `{projection_ty} == {term}`",),
)
.emit();
}
ty::ClauseKind::Projection(ty::ProjectionPredicate { projection_ty, term }) => Err(tcx
.dcx()
.struct_span_err(
span,
format!("cannot specialize on associated type `{projection_ty} == {term}`",),
)
.emit()),
ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..) => {
// FIXME(min_specialization), FIXME(const_generics):
// It probably isn't right to allow _every_ `ConstArgHasType` but I am somewhat unsure
@@ -483,12 +515,12 @@ fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>, sp
// While we do not support constructs like `<T, const N: T>` there is probably no risk of
// soundness bugs, but when we support generic const parameter types this will need to be
// revisited.
Ok(())
}
_ => {
tcx.dcx()
.struct_span_err(span, format!("cannot specialize on predicate `{clause}`"))
.emit();
}
_ => Err(tcx
.dcx()
.struct_span_err(span, format!("cannot specialize on predicate `{clause}`"))
.emit()),
}
}