Remove the DefinitelyInitializedPlaces analysis.

Its only use is in the `tests/ui/mir-dataflow/def_inits-1.rs` where it
is tested via `rustc_peek_definite_init`.

Also, it's probably buggy. It's supposed to be the inverse of
`MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, and it mostly is, except that
`apply_terminator_effect` is a little different, and
`apply_switch_int_edge_effects` is missing. Unlike
`MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, which is used extensively in borrow
checking, any bugs in `DefinitelyInitializedPlaces` are easy to overlook
because it is only used in one small test.

This commit removes the analysis. It also removes
`rustc_peek_definite_init`, `Dual` and `MeetSemiLattice`, all of which
are no longer needed.

compiler/rustc_mir_dataflow/src/rustc_peek.rs

@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@ use crate::errors::{
     PeekMustBePlaceOrRefPlace, StopAfterDataFlowEndedCompilation,
 };
 use crate::framework::BitSetExt;
-use crate::impls::{
-    DefinitelyInitializedPlaces, MaybeInitializedPlaces, MaybeLiveLocals, MaybeUninitializedPlaces,
-};
+use crate::impls::{MaybeInitializedPlaces, MaybeLiveLocals, MaybeUninitializedPlaces};
 use crate::move_paths::{HasMoveData, LookupResult, MoveData, MovePathIndex};
 use crate::{Analysis, JoinSemiLattice, ResultsCursor};
 
@@ -56,13 +54,6 @@ pub fn sanity_check<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &Body<'tcx>) {
         sanity_check_via_rustc_peek(tcx, flow_uninits.into_results_cursor(body));
     }
 
-    if has_rustc_mir_with(tcx, def_id, sym::rustc_peek_definite_init).is_some() {
-        let flow_def_inits =
-            DefinitelyInitializedPlaces::new(body, &move_data).iterate_to_fixpoint(tcx, body, None);
-
-        sanity_check_via_rustc_peek(tcx, flow_def_inits.into_results_cursor(body));
-    }
-
     if has_rustc_mir_with(tcx, def_id, sym::rustc_peek_liveness).is_some() {
         let flow_liveness = MaybeLiveLocals.iterate_to_fixpoint(tcx, body, None);