std: clarify semantics of SGX parker
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,11 +9,17 @@ use crate::sync::atomic::Ordering::{Acquire, Relaxed, Release};
|
||||
use crate::time::Duration;
|
||||
use fortanix_sgx_abi::{EV_UNPARK, WAIT_INDEFINITE};
|
||||
|
||||
const EMPTY: *mut u8 = ptr::invalid_mut(0);
|
||||
/// The TCS structure must be page-aligned, so this cannot be a valid pointer
|
||||
const NOTIFIED: *mut u8 = ptr::invalid_mut(1);
|
||||
// The TCS structure must be page-aligned (this is checked by EENTER), so these cannot
|
||||
// be valid pointers
|
||||
const EMPTY: *mut u8 = ptr::invalid_mut(1);
|
||||
const NOTIFIED: *mut u8 = ptr::invalid_mut(2);
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct Parker {
|
||||
/// The park state. One of EMPTY, NOTIFIED or a TCS address.
|
||||
/// A state change to NOTIFIED must be done with release ordering
|
||||
/// and be observed with acquire ordering so that operations after
|
||||
/// `thread::park` returns will not occur before the unpark message
|
||||
/// was sent.
|
||||
state: AtomicPtr<u8>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,23 +36,28 @@ impl Parker {
|
||||
|
||||
// This implementation doesn't require `unsafe` and `Pin`, but other implementations do.
|
||||
pub unsafe fn park(self: Pin<&Self>) {
|
||||
let tcs = thread::current().as_ptr();
|
||||
|
||||
if self.state.load(Acquire) != NOTIFIED {
|
||||
if self.state.compare_exchange(EMPTY, tcs, Acquire, Acquire).is_ok() {
|
||||
// Loop to guard against spurious wakeups.
|
||||
let mut prev = EMPTY;
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
// Guard against changing TCS addresses by always setting the state to
|
||||
// the current value.
|
||||
let tcs = thread::current().as_ptr();
|
||||
if self.state.compare_exchange(prev, tcs, Relaxed, Acquire).is_ok() {
|
||||
let event = usercalls::wait(EV_UNPARK, WAIT_INDEFINITE).unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(event & EV_UNPARK == EV_UNPARK);
|
||||
if self.state.load(Acquire) == NOTIFIED {
|
||||
prev = tcs;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// The state was definitely changed by another thread at this point.
|
||||
// The only time this occurs is when the state is changed to NOTIFIED.
|
||||
// We observed this change with acquire ordering, so we can simply
|
||||
// change the state to EMPTY with a relaxed store.
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, the token was definately read with acquire ordering,
|
||||
// so this can be a store.
|
||||
// so this can be a relaxed store.
|
||||
self.state.store(EMPTY, Relaxed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +67,7 @@ impl Parker {
|
||||
let tcs = thread::current().as_ptr();
|
||||
|
||||
if self.state.load(Acquire) != NOTIFIED {
|
||||
if self.state.compare_exchange(EMPTY, tcs, Acquire, Acquire).is_ok() {
|
||||
if self.state.compare_exchange(EMPTY, tcs, Relaxed, Acquire).is_ok() {
|
||||
match usercalls::wait(EV_UNPARK, timeout) {
|
||||
Ok(event) => assert!(event & EV_UNPARK == EV_UNPARK),
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
@@ -85,8 +96,11 @@ impl Parker {
|
||||
if !matches!(state, EMPTY | NOTIFIED) {
|
||||
// There is a thread waiting, wake it up.
|
||||
let tcs = NonNull::new(state).unwrap();
|
||||
// This will fail if the thread has already terminated by the time the signal is send,
|
||||
// but that is OK.
|
||||
// This will fail if the thread has already terminated or its TCS is destroyed
|
||||
// by the time the signal is sent, but that is fine. If another thread receives
|
||||
// the same TCS, it will receive this notification as a spurious wakeup, but
|
||||
// all users of `wait` should and (internally) do guard against those where
|
||||
// necessary.
|
||||
let _ = usercalls::send(EV_UNPARK, Some(tcs));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user