order added_goals_evaluation and nested_probes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,25 +103,34 @@ impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct WipProbe<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub added_goals_evaluations: Vec<WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub nested_probes: Vec<WipProbe<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub steps: Vec<WipProbeStep<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: Option<ProbeKind<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipProbe<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::Probe<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::Probe {
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: self
|
||||
.added_goals_evaluations
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation::finalize)
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
nested_probes: self.nested_probes.into_iter().map(WipProbe::finalize).collect(),
|
||||
steps: self.steps.into_iter().map(WipProbeStep::finalize).collect(),
|
||||
kind: self.kind.unwrap(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub enum WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
EvaluateGoals(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
NestedProbe(WipProbe<'tcx>),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::ProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
WipProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval) => inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval.finalize()),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe) => inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe.finalize()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
pub enum DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
Root,
|
||||
@@ -329,11 +338,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
instantiated_goal,
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe {
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
nested_probes: vec![],
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps: vec![], kind: None },
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_step(&mut self, goal_evaluation_step: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
@@ -351,11 +356,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_probe(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipProbe {
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
nested_probes: vec![],
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipProbe { steps: vec![], kind: None })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn probe_kind(&mut self, probe_kind: ProbeKind<'tcx>) {
|
||||
@@ -373,13 +374,13 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, probe.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { nested_probes, .. })
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { nested_probes, .. },
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(probe),
|
||||
) => nested_probes.push(probe),
|
||||
) => steps.push(WipProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe)),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -416,12 +417,12 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
match (this, added_goals_evaluation.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { added_goals_evaluations, .. },
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { added_goals_evaluations, .. }),
|
||||
| DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
) => added_goals_evaluations.push(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
) => steps.push(WipProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(added_goals_evaluation)),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user