Rename the ConstS::val field as kind.

And likewise for the `Const::val` method.

Because its type is called `ConstKind`. Also `val` is a confusing name
because `ConstKind` is an enum with seven variants, one of which is
called `Value`. Also, this gives consistency with `TyS` and `PredicateS`
which have `kind` fields.

The commit also renames a few `Const` variables from `val` to `c`, to
avoid confusion with the `ConstKind::Value` variant.
This commit is contained in:
Nicholas Nethercote
2022-06-10 11:18:06 +10:00
parent ca122c7ebb
commit 93e4b6ef06
74 changed files with 173 additions and 169 deletions

View File

@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
bound_vars.push(bound_var);
tcx.mk_const(ty::ConstS {
ty: tcx.type_of(param.def_id),
val: ty::ConstKind::Bound(
kind: ty::ConstKind::Bound(
ty::INNERMOST,
ty::BoundVar::from_usize(bound_vars.len() - 1),
),
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// Lifetimes aren't allowed to change during unsizing.
GenericArgKind::Lifetime(_) => None,
GenericArgKind::Const(ct) => match ct.val() {
GenericArgKind::Const(ct) => match ct.kind() {
ty::ConstKind::Param(p) => Some(p.index),
_ => None,
},

View File

@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
//
// Let's just see where this breaks :shrug:
if let (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(a), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(b)) =
(c1.val(), c2.val())
(c1.kind(), c2.kind())
{
if self.infcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(
a.shrink(),
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
}
let evaluate = |c: ty::Const<'tcx>| {
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(unevaluated) = c.val() {
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(unevaluated) = c.kind() {
self.infcx
.const_eval_resolve(
obligation.param_env,