normalizes-to change from '1' to '0 to inf' steps
This commit is contained in:
@@ -130,17 +130,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
|
||||
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
|
||||
}
|
||||
inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(_)
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeStep::CommitIfOkStart
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeStep::CommitIfOkSuccess => (),
|
||||
inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(_) => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
match probe.kind {
|
||||
inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::CommitIfOk => (),
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility => (),
|
||||
// We add a candidate for the root evaluation if there
|
||||
// is only one way to prove a given goal, e.g. for `WellFormed`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +154,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
inspect::ProbeKind::MiscCandidate { name: _, result }
|
||||
inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { result }
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::MiscCandidate { name: _, result }
|
||||
| inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: _, result } => {
|
||||
candidates.push(InspectCandidate {
|
||||
goal: self,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -220,8 +220,6 @@ enum WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
AddGoal(GoalSource, inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>),
|
||||
EvaluateGoals(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
NestedProbe(WipProbe<'tcx>),
|
||||
CommitIfOkStart,
|
||||
CommitIfOkSuccess,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
@@ -230,8 +228,6 @@ impl<'tcx> WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
WipProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval) => inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval.finalize()),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe) => inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe.finalize()),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::CommitIfOkStart => inspect::ProbeStep::CommitIfOkStart,
|
||||
WipProbeStep::CommitIfOkSuccess => inspect::ProbeStep::CommitIfOkSuccess,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -467,29 +463,6 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Used by `EvalCtxt::commit_if_ok` to flatten the work done inside
|
||||
/// of the probe into the parent.
|
||||
pub fn integrate_snapshot(&mut self, probe: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *probe.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(probe),
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
steps.push(WipProbeStep::CommitIfOkStart);
|
||||
assert_eq!(probe.kind, None);
|
||||
steps.extend(probe.steps);
|
||||
steps.push(WipProbeStep::CommitIfOkSuccess);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_evaluate_added_goals(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipAddedGoalsEvaluation { evaluations: vec![], result: None })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user