coverage: Use a query to identify which counter/expression IDs are used

This commit is contained in:
Zalathar
2024-11-24 18:26:05 +11:00
parent 121a17ccc3
commit 6fc0fe76e8
7 changed files with 93 additions and 92 deletions

View File

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
use rustc_data_structures::captures::Captures;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_middle::mir::CoverageIdsInfo;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{
CounterId, CovTerm, Expression, ExpressionId, FunctionCoverageInfo, Mapping, MappingKind, Op,
SourceRegion,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::Instance;
use tracing::{debug, instrument};
use tracing::debug;
use crate::coverageinfo::ffi::{Counter, CounterExpression, ExprKind};
@@ -16,17 +17,8 @@ use crate::coverageinfo::ffi::{Counter, CounterExpression, ExprKind};
pub(crate) struct FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
/// Coverage info that was attached to this function by the instrumentor.
function_coverage_info: &'tcx FunctionCoverageInfo,
ids_info: &'tcx CoverageIdsInfo,
is_used: bool,
/// Tracks which counters have been seen, so that we can identify mappings
/// to counters that were optimized out, and set them to zero.
counters_seen: BitSet<CounterId>,
/// Contains all expression IDs that have been seen in an `ExpressionUsed`
/// coverage statement, plus all expression IDs that aren't directly used
/// by any mappings (and therefore do not have expression-used statements).
/// After MIR traversal is finished, we can conclude that any IDs missing
/// from this set must have had their statements deleted by MIR opts.
expressions_seen: BitSet<ExpressionId>,
}
impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
@@ -34,21 +26,24 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
pub(crate) fn new(
instance: Instance<'tcx>,
function_coverage_info: &'tcx FunctionCoverageInfo,
ids_info: &'tcx CoverageIdsInfo,
) -> Self {
Self::create(instance, function_coverage_info, true)
Self::create(instance, function_coverage_info, ids_info, true)
}
/// Creates a new set of coverage data for an unused (never called) function.
pub(crate) fn unused(
instance: Instance<'tcx>,
function_coverage_info: &'tcx FunctionCoverageInfo,
ids_info: &'tcx CoverageIdsInfo,
) -> Self {
Self::create(instance, function_coverage_info, false)
Self::create(instance, function_coverage_info, ids_info, false)
}
fn create(
instance: Instance<'tcx>,
function_coverage_info: &'tcx FunctionCoverageInfo,
ids_info: &'tcx CoverageIdsInfo,
is_used: bool,
) -> Self {
let num_counters = function_coverage_info.num_counters;
@@ -58,44 +53,7 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
num_counters={num_counters}, num_expressions={num_expressions}, is_used={is_used}"
);
// Create a filled set of expression IDs, so that expressions not
// directly used by mappings will be treated as "seen".
// (If they end up being unused, LLVM will delete them for us.)
let mut expressions_seen = BitSet::new_filled(num_expressions);
// For each expression ID that is directly used by one or more mappings,
// mark it as not-yet-seen. This indicates that we expect to see a
// corresponding `ExpressionUsed` statement during MIR traversal.
for mapping in function_coverage_info.mappings.iter() {
// Currently we only worry about ordinary code mappings.
// For branch and MC/DC mappings, expressions might not correspond
// to any particular point in the control-flow graph.
// (Keep this in sync with the injection of `ExpressionUsed`
// statements in the `InstrumentCoverage` MIR pass.)
if let MappingKind::Code(term) = mapping.kind
&& let CovTerm::Expression(id) = term
{
expressions_seen.remove(id);
}
}
Self {
function_coverage_info,
is_used,
counters_seen: BitSet::new_empty(num_counters),
expressions_seen,
}
}
/// Marks a counter ID as having been seen in a counter-increment statement.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
pub(crate) fn mark_counter_id_seen(&mut self, id: CounterId) {
self.counters_seen.insert(id);
}
/// Marks an expression ID as having been seen in an expression-used statement.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
pub(crate) fn mark_expression_id_seen(&mut self, id: ExpressionId) {
self.expressions_seen.insert(id);
Self { function_coverage_info, ids_info, is_used }
}
/// Identify expressions that will always have a value of zero, and note
@@ -117,7 +75,7 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
// (By construction, expressions can only refer to other expressions
// that have lower IDs, so one pass is sufficient.)
for (id, expression) in self.function_coverage_info.expressions.iter_enumerated() {
if !self.is_used || !self.expressions_seen.contains(id) {
if !self.is_used || !self.ids_info.expressions_seen.contains(id) {
// If an expression was not seen, it must have been optimized away,
// so any operand that refers to it can be replaced with zero.
zero_expressions.insert(id);
@@ -146,7 +104,7 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
assert_operand_expression_is_lower(id);
}
if is_zero_term(&self.counters_seen, &zero_expressions, *operand) {
if is_zero_term(&self.ids_info.counters_seen, &zero_expressions, *operand) {
*operand = CovTerm::Zero;
}
};
@@ -172,17 +130,17 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx> {
pub(crate) fn into_finished(self) -> FunctionCoverage<'tcx> {
let zero_expressions = self.identify_zero_expressions();
let FunctionCoverageCollector { function_coverage_info, is_used, counters_seen, .. } = self;
let FunctionCoverageCollector { function_coverage_info, ids_info, is_used, .. } = self;
FunctionCoverage { function_coverage_info, is_used, counters_seen, zero_expressions }
FunctionCoverage { function_coverage_info, ids_info, is_used, zero_expressions }
}
}
pub(crate) struct FunctionCoverage<'tcx> {
pub(crate) function_coverage_info: &'tcx FunctionCoverageInfo,
ids_info: &'tcx CoverageIdsInfo,
is_used: bool,
counters_seen: BitSet<CounterId>,
zero_expressions: ZeroExpressions,
}
@@ -238,7 +196,7 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverage<'tcx> {
}
fn is_zero_term(&self, term: CovTerm) -> bool {
!self.is_used || is_zero_term(&self.counters_seen, &self.zero_expressions, term)
!self.is_used || is_zero_term(&self.ids_info.counters_seen, &self.zero_expressions, term)
}
}