Rename HandlerInner::delay_span_bug as HandlerInner::span_delayed_bug.
Because the corresponding `Level` is `DelayedBug` and `span_delayed_bug` follows the pattern used everywhere else: `span_err`, `span_warning`, etc.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>(
|
||||
// FIXME(generic_const_exprs): we have a `ConstKind::Expr` which is fully concrete, but
|
||||
// currently it is not possible to evaluate `ConstKind::Expr` so we are unable to tell if it
|
||||
// is evaluatable or not. For now we just ICE until this is implemented.
|
||||
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(
|
||||
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
"evaluating `ConstKind::Expr` is not currently supported",
|
||||
)))
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>(
|
||||
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv, Some(span));
|
||||
match concrete {
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(_)) => {
|
||||
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(infcx.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(
|
||||
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(infcx.tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
"Missing value for constant, but no error reported?",
|
||||
)))
|
||||
@@ -138,10 +138,10 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>(
|
||||
} else if uv.has_non_region_param() {
|
||||
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let guar = infcx
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.sess
|
||||
.delay_span_bug(span, "Missing value for constant, but no error reported?");
|
||||
let guar = infcx.tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
"Missing value for constant, but no error reported?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
NotConstEvaluatable::Error(guar)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user