Rollup merge of #147577 - JohnTitor:issue-147312, r=davidtwco

Improve error message for ambiguous numeric types in closure parameters

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147312

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/suggest.rs

@@ -2547,6 +2547,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                             "you must specify a type for this binding, like `{concrete_type}`",
                         );
 
+                        // FIXME: Maybe FileName::Anon should also be handled,
+                        // otherwise there would be no suggestion if the source is STDIN for example.
                         match (filename, parent_node) {
                             (
                                 FileName::Real(_),
@@ -2568,6 +2570,44 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                                     Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
                                 );
                             }
+                            // For closure parameters with reference patterns (e.g., |&v|), suggest the type annotation
+                            // on the pattern itself, e.g., |&v: &i32|
+                            (FileName::Real(_), Node::Pat(pat))
+                                if let Node::Pat(binding_pat) = self.tcx.hir_node(hir_id)
+                                    && let hir::PatKind::Binding(..) = binding_pat.kind
+                                    && let Node::Pat(parent_pat) = parent_node
+                                    && matches!(parent_pat.kind, hir::PatKind::Ref(..)) =>
+                            {
+                                err.span_label(span, "you must specify a type for this binding");
+
+                                let mut ref_muts = Vec::new();
+                                let mut current_node = parent_node;
+
+                                while let Node::Pat(parent_pat) = current_node {
+                                    if let hir::PatKind::Ref(_, mutability) = parent_pat.kind {
+                                        ref_muts.push(mutability);
+                                        current_node = self.tcx.parent_hir_node(parent_pat.hir_id);
+                                    } else {
+                                        break;
+                                    }
+                                }
+
+                                let mut type_annotation = String::new();
+                                for mutability in ref_muts.iter().rev() {
+                                    match mutability {
+                                        hir::Mutability::Mut => type_annotation.push_str("&mut "),
+                                        hir::Mutability::Not => type_annotation.push('&'),
+                                    }
+                                }
+                                type_annotation.push_str(&concrete_type);
+
+                                err.span_suggestion_verbose(
+                                    pat.span.shrink_to_hi(),
+                                    "specify the type in the closure argument list",
+                                    format!(": {type_annotation}"),
+                                    Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
+                                );
+                            }
                             _ => {
                                 err.span_label(span, msg);
                             }

tests/ui/inference/ambiguous-numeric-in-closure-ref.fixed

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// Test for better error message when numeric type is ambiguous in closure parameter with reference
+
+//@ run-rustfix
+
+fn main() {
+    let _ = (0..10).filter(|&v: &i32| v.pow(2) > 0);
+    //~^ ERROR can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+    //~| SUGGESTION &i32
+
+    let v = vec![0, 1, 2];
+    let _ = v.iter().filter(|&&v: &&i32| v.pow(2) > 0);
+    //~^ ERROR can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+    //~| SUGGESTION &&i32
+}

tests/ui/inference/ambiguous-numeric-in-closure-ref.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// Test for better error message when numeric type is ambiguous in closure parameter with reference
+
+//@ run-rustfix
+
+fn main() {
+    let _ = (0..10).filter(|&v| v.pow(2) > 0);
+    //~^ ERROR can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+    //~| SUGGESTION &i32
+
+    let v = vec![0, 1, 2];
+    let _ = v.iter().filter(|&&v| v.pow(2) > 0);
+    //~^ ERROR can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+    //~| SUGGESTION &&i32
+}

tests/ui/inference/ambiguous-numeric-in-closure-ref.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+error[E0689]: can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+  --> $DIR/ambiguous-numeric-in-closure-ref.rs:6:35
+   |
+LL |     let _ = (0..10).filter(|&v| v.pow(2) > 0);
+   |                              -    ^^^
+   |                              |
+   |                              you must specify a type for this binding
+   |
+help: specify the type in the closure argument list
+   |
+LL |     let _ = (0..10).filter(|&v: &i32| v.pow(2) > 0);
+   |                               ++++++
+
+error[E0689]: can't call method `pow` on ambiguous numeric type `{integer}`
+  --> $DIR/ambiguous-numeric-in-closure-ref.rs:11:37
+   |
+LL |     let _ = v.iter().filter(|&&v| v.pow(2) > 0);
+   |                                -    ^^^
+   |                                |
+   |                                you must specify a type for this binding
+   |
+help: specify the type in the closure argument list
+   |
+LL |     let _ = v.iter().filter(|&&v: &&i32| v.pow(2) > 0);
+   |                                 +++++++
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0689`.