rust-lang/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #106248 - dtolnay:revertupcastlint, r=jackh726

Browse Source 
Revert "Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint"

This is a clean revert of #105484.

I confirmed that reverting that PR fixes the regression reported in #106247. ~~I can't say I understand what this code is doing, but maybe it can be re-landed with a different implementation.~~ **Edit:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106247#issuecomment-1367174384 has an explanation of why #105484 ends up surfacing spurious `where_clause_object_safety` errors. The implementation of `where_clause_object_safety` assumes we only check whether a trait is object safe when somebody actually uses that trait with `dyn`. However the implementation of `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` added in the problematic PR involves checking *every* trait for whether it is object-safe.

FYI `@nbdd0121` `@compiler-errors`
This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet
2022-12-30 21:26:34 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent fad73392dc 4271ed48e9
commit 5b74a33b8d
12 changed files with 9 additions and 167 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
library/core/src/lib.rs
View File

@@ -95,7 +95,6 @@
#![warn(missing_docs)]
#![allow(explicit_outlives_requirements)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
#![cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), warn(multiple_supertrait_upcastable))]
//
// Library features:
#![feature(const_align_offset)]
@@ -232,7 +231,6 @@
#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]
#![feature(asm_const)]
#![feature(const_transmute_copy)]
#![cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), feature(multiple_supertrait_upcastable))]
//
// Target features:
#![feature(arm_target_feature)]