Rename implied_const_bounds to explicit_implied_const_bounds

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_impl_item.rs

@@ -2083,7 +2083,7 @@ pub(super) fn check_type_bounds<'tcx>(
     // Only in a const implementation do we need to check that the `~const` item bounds hold.
     if tcx.is_conditionally_const(impl_ty_def_id) {
         obligations.extend(
-            tcx.implied_const_bounds(trait_ty.def_id)
+            tcx.explicit_implied_const_bounds(trait_ty.def_id)
                 .iter_instantiated_copied(tcx, rebased_args)
                 .map(|(c, span)| {
                     traits::Obligation::new(

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect.rs

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
             predicates_of::explicit_supertraits_containing_assoc_item,
         trait_explicit_predicates_and_bounds: predicates_of::trait_explicit_predicates_and_bounds,
         const_conditions: predicates_of::const_conditions,
-        implied_const_bounds: predicates_of::implied_const_bounds,
+        explicit_implied_const_bounds: predicates_of::explicit_implied_const_bounds,
         type_param_predicates: predicates_of::type_param_predicates,
         trait_def,
         adt_def,

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect/predicates_of.rs

@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ pub(super) fn const_conditions<'tcx>(
     }
 }
 
-pub(super) fn implied_const_bounds<'tcx>(
+pub(super) fn explicit_implied_const_bounds<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     def_id: LocalDefId,
 ) -> ty::EarlyBinder<'tcx, &'tcx [(ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>, Span)]> {
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ pub(super) fn implied_const_bounds<'tcx>(
         Node::TraitItem(hir::TraitItem { kind: hir::TraitItemKind::Type(..), .. }) => {
             explicit_item_bounds_with_filter(tcx, def_id, PredicateFilter::ConstIfConst)
         }
-        _ => bug!("implied_const_bounds called on wrong item: {def_id:?}"),
+        _ => bug!("explicit_implied_const_bounds called on wrong item: {def_id:?}"),
     };
 
     bounds.map_bound(|bounds| {