Spellchecking compiler comments
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
|
||||
&self.sess.span_diagnostic
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Relace `self` with `snapshot.parser` and extend `unclosed_delims` with `snapshot.unclosed_delims`.
|
||||
/// Replace `self` with `snapshot.parser` and extend `unclosed_delims` with `snapshot.unclosed_delims`.
|
||||
/// This is to avoid losing unclosed delims errors `create_snapshot_for_diagnostic` clears.
|
||||
pub(super) fn restore_snapshot(&mut self, snapshot: SnapshotParser<'a>) {
|
||||
*self = snapshot.parser;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
|
||||
lhs = self.parse_assoc_op_ascribe(lhs, lhs_span)?;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
} else if op == AssocOp::DotDot || op == AssocOp::DotDotEq {
|
||||
// If we didn’t have to handle `x..`/`x..=`, it would be pretty easy to
|
||||
// If we did not have to handle `x..`/`x..=`, it would be pretty easy to
|
||||
// generalise it to the Fixity::None code.
|
||||
lhs = self.parse_range_expr(prec, lhs, op, cur_op_span)?;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ pub struct Parser<'a> {
|
||||
pub current_closure: Option<ClosureSpans>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Stores span informations about a closure.
|
||||
/// Stores span information about a closure.
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct ClosureSpans {
|
||||
pub whole_closure: Span,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user