support const_evaluatable_checked across crate boundaries
This commit is contained in:
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We don't have to look at concrete constants, as we
|
||||
// can just evaluate them.
|
||||
if !body.is_polymorphic {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Some(AbstractConstBuilder {
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
body,
|
||||
@@ -304,6 +310,15 @@ pub(super) fn mir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
|
||||
def: ty::WithOptConstParam<LocalDefId>,
|
||||
) -> Option<&'tcx [Node<'tcx>]> {
|
||||
if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
|
||||
match tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
|
||||
// FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We currently only do this for anonymous constants,
|
||||
// meaning that we do not look into associated constants. I(@lcnr) am not yet sure whether
|
||||
// we want to look into them or treat them as opaque projections.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Right now we do neither of that and simply always fail to unify them.
|
||||
DefKind::AnonConst => (),
|
||||
_ => return None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
let body = tcx.mir_const(def).borrow();
|
||||
AbstractConstBuilder::new(tcx, &body)?.build()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user