internal: more reasonable grammar for blocks
Consider these expples
{ 92 }
async { 92 }
'a: { 92 }
#[a] { 92 }
Previously the tree for them were
BLOCK_EXPR
{ ... }
EFFECT_EXPR
async
BLOCK_EXPR
{ ... }
EFFECT_EXPR
'a:
BLOCK_EXPR
{ ... }
BLOCK_EXPR
#[a]
{ ... }
As you see, it gets progressively worse :) The last two items are
especially odd. The last one even violates the balanced curleys
invariant we have (#10357) The new approach is to say that the stuff in
`{}` is stmt_list, and the block is stmt_list + optional modifiers
BLOCK_EXPR
STMT_LIST
{ ... }
BLOCK_EXPR
async
STMT_LIST
{ ... }
BLOCK_EXPR
'a:
STMT_LIST
{ ... }
BLOCK_EXPR
#[a]
STMT_LIST
{ ... }
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ pub(super) fn atom_expr(p: &mut Parser, r: Restrictions) -> Option<(CompletedMar
|
||||
// test labeled_block
|
||||
// fn f() { 'label: {}; }
|
||||
T!['{'] => {
|
||||
block_expr(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, EFFECT_EXPR)
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
// test_err misplaced_label_err
|
||||
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ pub(super) fn atom_expr(p: &mut Parser, r: Restrictions) -> Option<(CompletedMar
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
p.bump(T![async]);
|
||||
p.eat(T![move]);
|
||||
block_expr(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, EFFECT_EXPR)
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
T![match] => match_expr(p),
|
||||
// test unsafe_block
|
||||
@@ -120,16 +120,16 @@ pub(super) fn atom_expr(p: &mut Parser, r: Restrictions) -> Option<(CompletedMar
|
||||
T![unsafe] if la == T!['{'] => {
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
p.bump(T![unsafe]);
|
||||
block_expr(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, EFFECT_EXPR)
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// test const_block
|
||||
// fn f() { const { } }
|
||||
T![const] if la == T!['{'] => {
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
p.bump(T![const]);
|
||||
block_expr(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, EFFECT_EXPR)
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
T!['{'] => {
|
||||
// test for_range_from
|
||||
@@ -138,7 +138,9 @@ pub(super) fn atom_expr(p: &mut Parser, r: Restrictions) -> Option<(CompletedMar
|
||||
// break;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
block_expr_unchecked(p)
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
T![return] => return_expr(p),
|
||||
T![yield] => yield_expr(p),
|
||||
@@ -150,9 +152,7 @@ pub(super) fn atom_expr(p: &mut Parser, r: Restrictions) -> Option<(CompletedMar
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
let blocklike = match done.kind() {
|
||||
IF_EXPR | WHILE_EXPR | FOR_EXPR | LOOP_EXPR | MATCH_EXPR | BLOCK_EXPR | EFFECT_EXPR => {
|
||||
BlockLike::Block
|
||||
}
|
||||
IF_EXPR | WHILE_EXPR | FOR_EXPR | LOOP_EXPR | MATCH_EXPR | BLOCK_EXPR => BlockLike::Block,
|
||||
_ => BlockLike::NotBlock,
|
||||
};
|
||||
Some((done, blocklike))
|
||||
@@ -486,16 +486,18 @@ pub(crate) fn block_expr(p: &mut Parser) {
|
||||
p.error("expected a block");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
block_expr_unchecked(p);
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn block_expr_unchecked(p: &mut Parser) -> CompletedMarker {
|
||||
fn stmt_list(p: &mut Parser) -> CompletedMarker {
|
||||
assert!(p.at(T!['{']));
|
||||
let m = p.start();
|
||||
p.bump(T!['{']);
|
||||
expr_block_contents(p);
|
||||
p.expect(T!['}']);
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
m.complete(p, STMT_LIST)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// test return_expr
|
||||
@@ -597,8 +599,12 @@ fn try_block_expr(p: &mut Parser, m: Option<Marker>) -> CompletedMarker {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
p.bump(T![try]);
|
||||
block_expr(p);
|
||||
m.complete(p, EFFECT_EXPR)
|
||||
if p.at(T!['{']) {
|
||||
stmt_list(p);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
p.error("expected a block")
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.complete(p, BLOCK_EXPR)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// test box_expr
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user