Change InferCtxtBuilder from enter to build

This commit is contained in:
Cameron Steffen
2022-09-19 22:03:59 -05:00
parent 91269fa5b8
commit 283abbf0e7
53 changed files with 1966 additions and 2182 deletions

View File

@@ -30,30 +30,29 @@ fn try_normalize_after_erasing_regions<'tcx, T: TypeFoldable<'tcx> + PartialEq +
goal: ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, T>,
) -> Result<T, NoSolution> {
let ParamEnvAnd { param_env, value } = goal;
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
match infcx.at(&cause, param_env).normalize(value) {
Ok(Normalized { value: normalized_value, obligations: normalized_obligations }) => {
// We don't care about the `obligations`; they are
// always only region relations, and we are about to
// erase those anyway:
debug_assert_eq!(
normalized_obligations.iter().find(|p| not_outlives_predicate(p.predicate)),
None,
);
let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build();
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
match infcx.at(&cause, param_env).normalize(value) {
Ok(Normalized { value: normalized_value, obligations: normalized_obligations }) => {
// We don't care about the `obligations`; they are
// always only region relations, and we are about to
// erase those anyway:
debug_assert_eq!(
normalized_obligations.iter().find(|p| not_outlives_predicate(p.predicate)),
None,
);
let resolved_value = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_value);
// It's unclear when `resolve_vars` would have an effect in a
// fresh `InferCtxt`. If this assert does trigger, it will give
// us a test case.
debug_assert_eq!(normalized_value, resolved_value);
let erased = infcx.tcx.erase_regions(resolved_value);
debug_assert!(!erased.needs_infer(), "{:?}", erased);
Ok(erased)
}
Err(NoSolution) => Err(NoSolution),
let resolved_value = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_value);
// It's unclear when `resolve_vars` would have an effect in a
// fresh `InferCtxt`. If this assert does trigger, it will give
// us a test case.
debug_assert_eq!(normalized_value, resolved_value);
let erased = infcx.tcx.erase_regions(resolved_value);
debug_assert!(!erased.needs_infer(), "{:?}", erased);
Ok(erased)
}
})
Err(NoSolution) => Err(NoSolution),
}
}
fn not_outlives_predicate<'tcx>(p: ty::Predicate<'tcx>) -> bool {