rust-lang/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes where the new solver is unconditionally used already

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Oli Scherer
2024-02-21 11:42:39 +00:00
parent 82ceed2add
commit 2247aaf276
3 changed files with 23 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs
View File

@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ fn rematch_impl<'tcx>(
let mut nested = infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
// New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
.map_err(|_| SelectionError::Unimplemented)?
.into_obligations();
@@ -257,7 +258,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
nested.extend(
infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a_elem_ty, b_elem_ty)
// New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a_elem_ty, b_elem_ty)
.expect("expected rematch to succeed")
.into_obligations(),
);
@@ -300,7 +302,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
nested.extend(
infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
// New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
.expect("expected rematch to succeed")
.into_obligations(),
);
@@ -329,7 +332,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
nested.extend(
infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
// New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
.expect("expected rematch to succeed")
.into_obligations(),
);