rust-lang/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #147109 - BoxyUwU:rename_concrete_opaques, r=lcnr

Browse Source 
Rename various "concrete opaque type" things to say "hidden type"

r? lcnr

I've found "concrete opaque type" terminology to be somewhat confusing as in conversation and when explaining opaque type stuff to people I always just talk about things in terms of hidden types. Also the hidden types of opaques are very much not *concrete* in the same sense that a type without any generic parameters is concrete which is an unfortunate overlap in terminology.

I've tried to update comments to also stop referring to things as concrete opaque types but this is mostly best effort as it difficult to find all such cases amongst the massive amounts of uses of "concrete" or "hidden" across the whole compiler.
This commit is contained in:
Stuart Cook
2025-09-30 22:25:17 +10:00
committed by GitHub
parent 5a6ac8c322 66b664c996
commit 156d150381
15 changed files with 83 additions and 109 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/check.rs
View File

@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ fn check_opaque(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: LocalDefId) {
// HACK(jynelson): trying to infer the type of `impl trait` breaks documenting
// `async-std` (and `pub async fn` in general).
// Since rustdoc doesn't care about the concrete type behind `impl Trait`, just don't look at it!
// Since rustdoc doesn't care about the hidden type behind `impl Trait`, just don't look at it!
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75100
if tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc {
return;
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ pub(super) fn check_opaque_for_cycles<'tcx>(
Ok(())
}
/// Check that the concrete type behind `impl Trait` actually implements `Trait`.
/// Check that the hidden type behind `impl Trait` actually implements `Trait`.
///
/// This is mostly checked at the places that specify the opaque type, but we
/// check those cases in the `param_env` of that function, which may have

12
compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect/type_of/opaque.rs
View File

@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TaitConstraintLocator<'tcx> {
let tables = tcx.typeck(item_def_id);
if let Some(guar) = tables.tainted_by_errors {
self.insert_found(ty::OpaqueHiddenType::new_error(tcx, guar));
} else if let Some(&hidden_type) = tables.concrete_opaque_types.get(&self.def_id) {
} else if let Some(&hidden_type) = tables.hidden_types.get(&self.def_id) {
self.insert_found(hidden_type);
} else {
self.non_defining_use_in_defining_scope(item_def_id);
@@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ impl<'tcx> TaitConstraintLocator<'tcx> {
}
DefiningScopeKind::MirBorrowck => match tcx.mir_borrowck(item_def_id) {
Err(guar) => self.insert_found(ty::OpaqueHiddenType::new_error(tcx, guar)),
Ok(concrete_opaque_types) => {
if let Some(&hidden_type) = concrete_opaque_types.0.get(&self.def_id) {
Ok(hidden_types) => {
if let Some(&hidden_type) = hidden_types.0.get(&self.def_id) {
debug!(?hidden_type, "found constraint");
self.insert_found(hidden_type);
} else if let Err(guar) = tcx
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ pub(super) fn find_opaque_ty_constraints_for_rpit<'tcx>(
let tables = tcx.typeck(owner_def_id);
if let Some(guar) = tables.tainted_by_errors {
Ty::new_error(tcx, guar)
} else if let Some(hidden_ty) = tables.concrete_opaque_types.get(&def_id) {
} else if let Some(hidden_ty) = tables.hidden_types.get(&def_id) {
hidden_ty.ty
} else {
assert!(!tcx.next_trait_solver_globally());
@@ -261,8 +261,8 @@ pub(super) fn find_opaque_ty_constraints_for_rpit<'tcx>(
}
}
DefiningScopeKind::MirBorrowck => match tcx.mir_borrowck(owner_def_id) {
Ok(concrete_opaque_types) => {
if let Some(hidden_ty) = concrete_opaque_types.0.get(&def_id) {
Ok(hidden_types) => {
if let Some(hidden_ty) = hidden_types.0.get(&def_id) {
hidden_ty.ty
} else {
let hir_ty = tcx.type_of_opaque_hir_typeck(def_id).instantiate_identity();