Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT
This commit is contained in:
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ fn suggest_restriction<'tcx>(
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if hir_generics.where_clause_span.from_expansion()
|
||||
|| hir_generics.where_clause_span.desugaring_kind().is_some()
|
||||
|| projection.is_some_and(|projection| tcx.opt_rpitit_info(projection.def_id).is_some())
|
||||
|| projection.is_some_and(|projection| tcx.is_impl_trait_in_trait(projection.def_id))
|
||||
{
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ fn object_safety_violation_for_assoc_item(
|
||||
ty::AssocKind::Type => {
|
||||
if !tcx.features().generic_associated_types_extended
|
||||
&& !tcx.generics_of(item.def_id).params.is_empty()
|
||||
&& item.opt_rpitit_info.is_none()
|
||||
&& !item.is_impl_trait_in_trait()
|
||||
{
|
||||
Some(ObjectSafetyViolation::GAT(item.name, item.ident(tcx).span))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user