Rollup merge of #113698 - compiler-errors:rpitit-check, r=spastorino
Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`. r? `@spastorino`
This commit is contained in:
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ fn missing_items_err(
|
||||
full_impl_span: Span,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let missing_items =
|
||||
missing_items.iter().filter(|trait_item| trait_item.opt_rpitit_info.is_none());
|
||||
missing_items.iter().filter(|trait_item| !trait_item.is_impl_trait_in_trait());
|
||||
|
||||
let missing_items_msg = missing_items
|
||||
.clone()
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user