rust/tests/ui/parser/better-expected.rs

fn main() {
    let x: [isize 3]; //~ ERROR expected `;` or `]`, found `3`
}
Make the parser’s ‘expected <foo>, found <bar>’ errors more accurate As an example of what this changes, the following code: let x: [int ..4]; Currently spits out ‘expected `]`, found `..`’. However, a comma would also be valid there, as would a number of other tokens. This change adjusts the parser to produce more accurate errors, so that that example now produces ‘expected one of `(`, `+`, `,`, `::`, or `]`, found `..`’. 2014-12-03 22:47:53 +13:00			`fn main() {`
Recover and suggest use `;` to construct array type Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn> 2025-07-14 04:28:20 +08:00			let x: [isize 3]; //~ ERROR expected `;` or `]`, found `3`
Make the parser’s ‘expected <foo>, found <bar>’ errors more accurate As an example of what this changes, the following code: let x: [int ..4]; Currently spits out ‘expected `]`, found `..`’. However, a comma would also be valid there, as would a number of other tokens. This change adjusts the parser to produce more accurate errors, so that that example now produces ‘expected one of `(`, `+`, `,`, `::`, or `]`, found `..`’. 2014-12-03 22:47:53 +13:00			`}`