Files
rust/compiler/rustc_lint/src/for_loop_over_fallibles.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

189 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use crate::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext};
use hir::{Expr, Pat};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_infer::traits::TraitEngine;
use rustc_infer::{infer::TyCtxtInferExt, traits::ObligationCause};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, List};
use rustc_span::{sym, Span};
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::TraitEngineExt;
declare_lint! {
/// The `for_loop_over_fallibles` lint checks for `for` loops over `Option` or `Result` values.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust
/// let opt = Some(1);
/// for x in opt { /* ... */}
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// Both `Option` and `Result` implement `IntoIterator` trait, which allows using them in a `for` loop.
/// `for` loop over `Option` or `Result` will iterate either 0 (if the value is `None`/`Err(_)`)
/// or 1 time (if the value is `Some(_)`/`Ok(_)`). This is not very useful and is more clearly expressed
/// via `if let`.
///
/// `for` loop can also be accidentally written with the intention to call a function multiple times,
/// while the function returns `Some(_)`, in these cases `while let` loop should be used instead.
///
/// The "intended" use of `IntoIterator` implementations for `Option` and `Result` is passing them to
/// generic code that expects something implementing `IntoIterator`. For example using `.chain(option)`
/// to optionally add a value to an iterator.
pub FOR_LOOP_OVER_FALLIBLES,
Warn,
"for-looping over an `Option` or a `Result`, which is more clearly expressed as an `if let`"
}
declare_lint_pass!(ForLoopOverFallibles => [FOR_LOOP_OVER_FALLIBLES]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ForLoopOverFallibles {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
let Some((pat, arg)) = extract_for_loop(expr) else { return };
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(arg);
let &ty::Adt(adt, substs) = ty.kind() else { return };
let (article, ty, var) = match adt.did() {
did if cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Option, did) => ("an", "Option", "Some"),
did if cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Result, did) => ("a", "Result", "Ok"),
_ => return,
};
let msg = format!(
"for loop over {article} `{ty}`. This is more readably written as an `if let` statement",
);
cx.struct_span_lint(FOR_LOOP_OVER_FALLIBLES, arg.span, |diag| {
let mut warn = diag.build(msg);
if let Some(recv) = extract_iterator_next_call(cx, arg)
&& let Ok(recv_snip) = cx.sess().source_map().span_to_snippet(recv.span)
{
warn.span_suggestion(
recv.span.between(arg.span.shrink_to_hi()),
format!("to iterate over `{recv_snip}` remove the call to `next`"),
".by_ref()",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
);
} else {
warn.multipart_suggestion_verbose(
format!("to check pattern in a loop use `while let`"),
vec![
// NB can't use `until` here because `expr.span` and `pat.span` have different syntax contexts
(expr.span.with_hi(pat.span.lo()), format!("while let {var}(")),
(pat.span.between(arg.span), format!(") = ")),
],
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
);
}
if suggest_question_mark(cx, adt, substs, expr.span) {
warn.span_suggestion(
arg.span.shrink_to_hi(),
"consider unwrapping the `Result` with `?` to iterate over its contents",
"?",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
warn.multipart_suggestion_verbose(
"consider using `if let` to clear intent",
vec![
// NB can't use `until` here because `expr.span` and `pat.span` have different syntax contexts
(expr.span.with_hi(pat.span.lo()), format!("if let {var}(")),
(pat.span.between(arg.span), format!(") = ")),
],
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
warn.emit()
})
}
}
fn extract_for_loop<'tcx>(expr: &Expr<'tcx>) -> Option<(&'tcx Pat<'tcx>, &'tcx Expr<'tcx>)> {
if let hir::ExprKind::DropTemps(e) = expr.kind
&& let hir::ExprKind::Match(iterexpr, [arm], hir::MatchSource::ForLoopDesugar) = e.kind
&& let hir::ExprKind::Call(_, [arg]) = iterexpr.kind
&& let hir::ExprKind::Loop(block, ..) = arm.body.kind
&& let [stmt] = block.stmts
&& let hir::StmtKind::Expr(e) = stmt.kind
&& let hir::ExprKind::Match(_, [_, some_arm], _) = e.kind
&& let hir::PatKind::Struct(_, [field], _) = some_arm.pat.kind
{
Some((field.pat, arg))
} else {
None
}
}
fn extract_iterator_next_call<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
expr: &Expr<'tcx>,
) -> Option<&'tcx Expr<'tcx>> {
// This won't work for `Iterator::next(iter)`, is this an issue?
if let hir::ExprKind::MethodCall(_, [recv], _) = expr.kind
&& cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def_id(expr.hir_id) == cx.tcx.lang_items().next_fn()
{
Some(recv)
} else {
return None
}
}
fn suggest_question_mark<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
adt: ty::AdtDef<'tcx>,
substs: &List<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
span: Span,
) -> bool {
let Some(body_id) = cx.enclosing_body else { return false };
let Some(into_iterator_did) = cx.tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::IntoIterator) else { return false };
if !cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Result, adt.did()) {
return false;
}
// Check that the function/closure/constant we are in has a `Result` type.
// Otherwise suggesting using `?` may not be a good idea.
{
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(&cx.tcx.hir().body(body_id).value);
let ty::Adt(ret_adt, ..) = ty.kind() else { return false };
if !cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Result, ret_adt.did()) {
return false;
}
}
let ty = substs.type_at(0);
let is_iterator = cx.tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'_>>::new(infcx.tcx);
let cause = ObligationCause::new(
span,
body_id.hir_id,
rustc_infer::traits::ObligationCauseCode::MiscObligation,
);
fulfill_cx.register_bound(
&infcx,
ty::ParamEnv::empty(),
// Erase any region vids from the type, which may not be resolved
infcx.tcx.erase_regions(ty),
into_iterator_did,
cause,
);
// Select all, including ambiguous predicates
let errors = fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(&infcx);
errors.is_empty()
});
is_iterator
}