rust/tests/ui/diagnostic-flags/allow-non-lint-warnings.without_flag.stderr

warning: skipping const checks
   |
help: skipping check that does not even have a feature gate
  --> $DIR/allow-non-lint-warnings.rs:24:23
   |
LL | const fn constant() { non_constant() }
   |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

warning: 1 warning emitted
Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]` 2025-03-30 00:39:55 +03:00			`warning: skipping const checks`
Adjust `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` - Document `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` - Move `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` under `tests/ui/diagnostic-flags/` - Improve the test to use two differential revisions: 1. One revision checks that without `-A warnings` the code sample actually emits a warning. 2. The other revision checks that `-A warnings` suppresses the warning. This makes sure that if the code sample no longer warns, the test doesn't silently pass but fail to check its intended purpose. 2024-12-05 08:09:02 +00:00			`\|`
Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]` 2025-03-30 00:39:55 +03:00			`help: skipping check that does not even have a feature gate`
			`--> $DIR/allow-non-lint-warnings.rs:24:23`
			`\|`
			`LL \| const fn constant() { non_constant() }`
			`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
Adjust `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` - Document `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` - Move `allow-non-lint-warnings.rs` under `tests/ui/diagnostic-flags/` - Improve the test to use two differential revisions: 1. One revision checks that without `-A warnings` the code sample actually emits a warning. 2. The other revision checks that `-A warnings` suppresses the warning. This makes sure that if the code sample no longer warns, the test doesn't silently pass but fail to check its intended purpose. 2024-12-05 08:09:02 +00:00
			`warning: 1 warning emitted`