Files
rust/tests/ui/stats/input-stats.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

179 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

ast-stats-1 PRE EXPANSION AST STATS
ast-stats-1 Name Accumulated Size Count Item Size
ast-stats-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------
ast-stats-1 Crate 40 ( 0.6%) 1 40
ast-stats-1 GenericArgs 40 ( 0.6%) 1 40
ast-stats-1 - AngleBracketed 40 ( 0.6%) 1
ast-stats-1 ExprField 48 ( 0.7%) 1 48
ast-stats-1 Attribute 64 ( 1.0%) 2 32
2022-11-22 16:23:25 +11:00
ast-stats-1 - DocComment 32 ( 0.5%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Normal 32 ( 0.5%) 1
ast-stats-1 WherePredicate 72 ( 1.1%) 1 72
ast-stats-1 - BoundPredicate 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 Local 80 ( 1.2%) 1 80
ast-stats-1 ForeignItem 88 ( 1.3%) 1 88
ast-stats-1 - Fn 88 ( 1.3%) 1
ast-stats-1 Arm 96 ( 1.4%) 2 48
ast-stats-1 FnDecl 120 ( 1.8%) 5 24
ast-stats-1 Param 160 ( 2.4%) 4 40
2023-12-20 15:22:06 +01:00
ast-stats-1 Stmt 160 ( 2.4%) 5 32
ast-stats-1 - Let 32 ( 0.5%) 1
2022-11-22 16:23:25 +11:00
ast-stats-1 - MacCall 32 ( 0.5%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Expr 96 ( 1.4%) 3
2023-11-24 14:32:05 +00:00
ast-stats-1 Block 192 ( 2.9%) 6 32
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-1 FieldDef 208 ( 3.1%) 2 104
ast-stats-1 Variant 208 ( 3.1%) 2 104
ast-stats-1 AssocItem 352 ( 5.3%) 4 88
ast-stats-1 - Fn 176 ( 2.6%) 2
ast-stats-1 - Type 176 ( 2.6%) 2
ast-stats-1 GenericBound 352 ( 5.3%) 4 88
ast-stats-1 - Trait 352 ( 5.3%) 4
ast-stats-1 GenericParam 480 ( 7.2%) 5 96
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-1 Pat 504 ( 7.5%) 7 72
ast-stats-1 - Struct 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Wild 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Ident 360 ( 5.4%) 5
ast-stats-1 Expr 576 ( 8.6%) 8 72
ast-stats-1 - Match 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Path 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Struct 72 ( 1.1%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Lit 144 ( 2.1%) 2
ast-stats-1 - Block 216 ( 3.2%) 3
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-1 PathSegment 744 (11.1%) 31 24
ast-stats-1 Ty 896 (13.4%) 14 64
ast-stats-1 - Ptr 64 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Ref 64 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - ImplicitSelf 128 ( 1.9%) 2
ast-stats-1 - Path 640 ( 9.5%) 10
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-1 Item 1_224 (18.3%) 9 136
ast-stats-1 - Enum 136 ( 2.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - ForeignMod 136 ( 2.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Impl 136 ( 2.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Trait 136 ( 2.0%) 1
ast-stats-1 - Fn 272 ( 4.1%) 2
ast-stats-1 - Use 408 ( 6.1%) 3
ast-stats-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------
ast-stats-1 Total 6_704 116
ast-stats-1
ast-stats-2 POST EXPANSION AST STATS
ast-stats-2 Name Accumulated Size Count Item Size
ast-stats-2 ----------------------------------------------------------------
ast-stats-2 Crate 40 ( 0.5%) 1 40
ast-stats-2 GenericArgs 40 ( 0.5%) 1 40
ast-stats-2 - AngleBracketed 40 ( 0.5%) 1
2023-01-30 14:13:27 +11:00
ast-stats-2 ExprField 48 ( 0.7%) 1 48
ast-stats-2 WherePredicate 72 ( 1.0%) 1 72
ast-stats-2 - BoundPredicate 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 Local 80 ( 1.1%) 1 80
ast-stats-2 ForeignItem 88 ( 1.2%) 1 88
ast-stats-2 - Fn 88 ( 1.2%) 1
2023-11-24 14:32:05 +00:00
ast-stats-2 Arm 96 ( 1.3%) 2 48
ast-stats-2 FnDecl 120 ( 1.6%) 5 24
ast-stats-2 InlineAsm 120 ( 1.6%) 1 120
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 Attribute 128 ( 1.7%) 4 32
2023-11-24 14:32:05 +00:00
ast-stats-2 - DocComment 32 ( 0.4%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Normal 96 ( 1.3%) 3
ast-stats-2 Param 160 ( 2.2%) 4 40
2023-11-24 14:32:05 +00:00
ast-stats-2 Stmt 160 ( 2.2%) 5 32
ast-stats-2 - Let 32 ( 0.4%) 1
2023-11-24 14:32:05 +00:00
ast-stats-2 - Semi 32 ( 0.4%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Expr 96 ( 1.3%) 3
ast-stats-2 Block 192 ( 2.6%) 6 32
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 FieldDef 208 ( 2.8%) 2 104
ast-stats-2 Variant 208 ( 2.8%) 2 104
ast-stats-2 AssocItem 352 ( 4.8%) 4 88
ast-stats-2 - Fn 176 ( 2.4%) 2
ast-stats-2 - Type 176 ( 2.4%) 2
ast-stats-2 GenericBound 352 ( 4.8%) 4 88
ast-stats-2 - Trait 352 ( 4.8%) 4
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 GenericParam 480 ( 6.5%) 5 96
ast-stats-2 Pat 504 ( 6.9%) 7 72
ast-stats-2 - Struct 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Wild 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Ident 360 ( 4.9%) 5
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 Expr 648 ( 8.8%) 9 72
ast-stats-2 - InlineAsm 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Match 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Path 72 ( 1.0%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Struct 72 ( 1.0%) 1
2023-01-30 14:13:27 +11:00
ast-stats-2 - Lit 144 ( 2.0%) 2
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 - Block 216 ( 2.9%) 3
ast-stats-2 PathSegment 864 (11.8%) 36 24
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 Ty 896 (12.2%) 14 64
ast-stats-2 - Ptr 64 ( 0.9%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Ref 64 ( 0.9%) 1
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
ast-stats-2 - ImplicitSelf 128 ( 1.7%) 2
ast-stats-2 - Path 640 ( 8.7%) 10
ast-stats-2 Item 1_496 (20.3%) 11 136
ast-stats-2 - Enum 136 ( 1.8%) 1
ast-stats-2 - ExternCrate 136 ( 1.8%) 1
ast-stats-2 - ForeignMod 136 ( 1.8%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Impl 136 ( 1.8%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Trait 136 ( 1.8%) 1
ast-stats-2 - Fn 272 ( 3.7%) 2
ast-stats-2 - Use 544 ( 7.4%) 4
ast-stats-2 ----------------------------------------------------------------
ast-stats-2 Total 7_352 127
ast-stats-2
hir-stats HIR STATS
hir-stats Name Accumulated Size Count Item Size
hir-stats ----------------------------------------------------------------
hir-stats ForeignItemRef 24 ( 0.3%) 1 24
hir-stats Lifetime 28 ( 0.3%) 1 28
hir-stats Mod 32 ( 0.4%) 1 32
hir-stats ExprField 40 ( 0.4%) 1 40
hir-stats TraitItemRef 56 ( 0.6%) 2 28
Add `ConstArgKind::Path` and make `ConstArg` its own HIR node This is a very large commit since a lot needs to be changed in order to make the tests pass. The salient changes are: - `ConstArgKind` gets a new `Path` variant, and all const params are now represented using it. Non-param paths still use `ConstArgKind::Anon` to prevent this change from getting too large, but they will soon use the `Path` variant too. - `ConstArg` gets a distinct `hir_id` field and its own variant in `hir::Node`. This affected many parts of the compiler that expected the parent of an `AnonConst` to be the containing context (e.g., an array repeat expression). They have been changed to check the "grandparent" where necessary. - Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`. - We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`. - Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable feature and is now tracked at #127009.
2024-07-16 19:07:36 -07:00
hir-stats GenericArg 64 ( 0.7%) 4 16
hir-stats - Type 16 ( 0.2%) 1
hir-stats - Lifetime 48 ( 0.5%) 3
hir-stats Local 64 ( 0.7%) 1 64
hir-stats Param 64 ( 0.7%) 2 32
hir-stats Body 72 ( 0.8%) 3 24
hir-stats ImplItemRef 72 ( 0.8%) 2 36
hir-stats InlineAsm 72 ( 0.8%) 1 72
hir-stats WherePredicate 72 ( 0.8%) 3 24
hir-stats - BoundPredicate 72 ( 0.8%) 3
hir-stats Arm 80 ( 0.9%) 2 40
hir-stats Stmt 96 ( 1.1%) 3 32
hir-stats - Expr 32 ( 0.4%) 1
hir-stats - Let 32 ( 0.4%) 1
hir-stats - Semi 32 ( 0.4%) 1
hir-stats FnDecl 120 ( 1.3%) 3 40
hir-stats Attribute 128 ( 1.4%) 4 32
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
hir-stats FieldDef 128 ( 1.4%) 2 64
hir-stats GenericArgs 144 ( 1.6%) 3 48
hir-stats Variant 144 ( 1.6%) 2 72
hir-stats GenericBound 256 ( 2.9%) 4 64
hir-stats - Trait 256 ( 2.9%) 4
hir-stats Block 288 ( 3.2%) 6 48
hir-stats Pat 360 ( 4.0%) 5 72
hir-stats - Struct 72 ( 0.8%) 1
hir-stats - Wild 72 ( 0.8%) 1
hir-stats - Binding 216 ( 2.4%) 3
hir-stats GenericParam 400 ( 4.5%) 5 80
hir-stats Generics 560 ( 6.2%) 10 56
hir-stats Ty 720 ( 8.0%) 15 48
hir-stats - Ptr 48 ( 0.5%) 1
hir-stats - Ref 48 ( 0.5%) 1
hir-stats - Path 624 ( 6.9%) 13
hir-stats Expr 768 ( 8.6%) 12 64
hir-stats - InlineAsm 64 ( 0.7%) 1
hir-stats - Match 64 ( 0.7%) 1
hir-stats - Path 64 ( 0.7%) 1
hir-stats - Struct 64 ( 0.7%) 1
hir-stats - Lit 128 ( 1.4%) 2
hir-stats - Block 384 ( 4.3%) 6
Introduce `default_field_values` feature Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681. Support default fields in enum struct variant Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition: ```rust pub enum Bar { Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant ```rust Bar::Foo { .. } ``` `#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants. Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields ```rust pub enum Bar { #[default] Foo { bar: S = S, baz: i32 = 42 + 3, } } ``` Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build. Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled). Properly instantiate MIR const The following works: ```rust struct S<A> { a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(), } S::<i32> { .. } ``` Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users' getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to *always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted. This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the expression relies on a const parameter. Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`: - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields. - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values. - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
hir-stats Item 968 (10.8%) 11 88
2023-09-14 22:38:07 +00:00
hir-stats - Enum 88 ( 1.0%) 1
hir-stats - ExternCrate 88 ( 1.0%) 1
hir-stats - ForeignMod 88 ( 1.0%) 1
hir-stats - Impl 88 ( 1.0%) 1
hir-stats - Trait 88 ( 1.0%) 1
hir-stats - Fn 176 ( 2.0%) 2
2023-09-14 22:38:07 +00:00
hir-stats - Use 352 ( 3.9%) 4
hir-stats Path 1_240 (13.8%) 31 40
hir-stats PathSegment 1_920 (21.4%) 40 48
hir-stats ----------------------------------------------------------------
hir-stats Total 8_980 180
hir-stats