rust/tests/ui/extern/issue-10025.rs

// run-pass
// pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
#![allow(dead_code)]

unsafe extern fn foo() {}
unsafe extern "C" fn bar() {}

fn main() {
    let _a: unsafe extern fn() = foo;
    let _a: unsafe extern "C" fn() = foo;
}
Add `// run-pass` annotations to all the tests under `ui/run-pass/`. (I may have accidentally added it to some auxilliary crates as well; my emacs-macro-based methodology was pretty crude.) 2018-08-30 14:18:55 +02:00			`// run-pass`
rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work. 2015-03-22 13:13:15 -07:00			`// pretty-expanded FIXME #23616`
Update code to account for extern ABI requirement 2020-09-01 17:28:11 -04:00			`#![allow(dead_code)]`
rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work. 2015-03-22 13:13:15 -07:00
rustc: Enable writing "unsafe extern fn() {}" Previously, the parser would not allow you to simultaneously implement a function with a different abi as well as being unsafe at the same time. This extends the parser to allow functions of the form: unsafe extern fn foo() { // ... } The closure type grammar was also changed to reflect this reversal, types previously written as "extern unsafe fn()" must now be written as "unsafe extern fn()". The parser currently has a hack which allows the old style, but this will go away once a snapshot has landed. Closes #10025 [breaking-change] 2014-05-06 18:43:56 -07:00			`unsafe extern fn foo() {}`
			`unsafe extern "C" fn bar() {}`

			`fn main() {`
			`let _a: unsafe extern fn() = foo;`
			`let _a: unsafe extern "C" fn() = foo;`
			`}`