rust/tests/ui/recursion/recursive-static-definition.stderr

error[E0080]: encountered static that tried to initialize itself with itself
  --> $DIR/recursive-static-definition.rs:1:23
   |
LL | pub static FOO: u32 = FOO;
   |                       ^^^ evaluation of static initializer failed here

error[E0080]: encountered static that tried to initialize itself with itself
  --> $DIR/recursive-static-definition.rs:9:23
   |
LL | pub static BAR: Foo = BAR;
   |                       ^^^ evaluation of static initializer failed here

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.
Use the informative error as the main const eval error message 2025-05-28 10:29:08 +00:00			`error[E0080]: encountered static that tried to initialize itself with itself`
use precise spans for recursive const evaluation 2022-06-04 15:48:16 -04:00			`--> $DIR/recursive-static-definition.rs:1:23`
Deduplicate all the ~~things~~ errors 2018-08-31 10:40:14 +02:00			`\|`
			`LL \| pub static FOO: u32 = FOO;`
Clarify why we are talking about a failed const eval at a random place 2025-05-30 14:06:35 +00:00			`\| ^^^ evaluation of static initializer failed here`
Do not allocate a second "background" alloc id for the main allocation of a static. Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter. 2023-10-12 11:27:43 +00:00
Use the informative error as the main const eval error message 2025-05-28 10:29:08 +00:00			`error[E0080]: encountered static that tried to initialize itself with itself`
Do not allocate a second "background" alloc id for the main allocation of a static. Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter. 2023-10-12 11:27:43 +00:00			`--> $DIR/recursive-static-definition.rs:9:23`
Make some lints incremental. 2022-06-18 19:48:44 +02:00			`\|`
Do not allocate a second "background" alloc id for the main allocation of a static. Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter. 2023-10-12 11:27:43 +00:00			`LL \| pub static BAR: Foo = BAR;`
Clarify why we are talking about a failed const eval at a random place 2025-05-30 14:06:35 +00:00			`\| ^^^ evaluation of static initializer failed here`
Moved compile-fail tests to ui tests. 2018-08-08 14:28:26 +02:00
Do not allocate a second "background" alloc id for the main allocation of a static. Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter. 2023-10-12 11:27:43 +00:00			`error: aborting due to 2 previous errors`
Moved compile-fail tests to ui tests. 2018-08-08 14:28:26 +02:00
Do not allocate a second "background" alloc id for the main allocation of a static. Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter. 2023-10-12 11:27:43 +00:00			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.