more cheekiness
This commit is contained in:
7
FAQ.adoc
7
FAQ.adoc
@@ -317,6 +317,8 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cute_cat_theory_of_digital_activism
|
||||
|
||||
Nope, someone told me about it after a while, but it is basically what I'm doing.
|
||||
|
||||
You can never invent anything new anymore nowadays.
|
||||
|
||||
== Making China powerful and rich justifies anything
|
||||
|
||||
That's a valid belief.
|
||||
@@ -370,6 +372,7 @@ This is a point that makes me worry, but consider:
|
||||
+
|
||||
Forbidding them also has huge humanitarian costs (more expensive vehicles, creation of a black market, ...). So why not forbid them as well?
|
||||
|
||||
[[falun-gong-changed]]
|
||||
=== Falun Gong is completely different in the West than it was in China
|
||||
|
||||
I believe that it has changed.
|
||||
@@ -585,6 +588,10 @@ By this logic, everyone should go to jail. The law should only punish individual
|
||||
|
||||
The communist party, which has had continuous power since 1949, killed millions during the cultural revolution. Surely they must be banned, no?
|
||||
|
||||
But the CCP has changed so much since those days, I hear you say.
|
||||
|
||||
I agree. And <<falun-gong-changed,so has FLG>>.
|
||||
|
||||
=== People from movement X are only in it for political power
|
||||
|
||||
For every desire of the masses, there will be amoral representatives that will step to use that power.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user