Radical: I don't consider myself a radical because I actually have doubts about doing this sometimes.
Also I don't consider the Chinese Government Evil or anything like that. To me, it's just another non-democratic empire like the Qing Dynasty. 共产朝 as I call them. But alas, I'm not the inventor of the expression: <http://web.archive.org/web/20161025220242/http://tieba.baidu.com/p/752094668>
I never get mad. Only a slightly sad or annoyed sometimes.
But I do admit that I am hard headed like almost all humans, and it is very unlikely that anything anyone says will change my mind about subjective political matters.
In the end I just end up thinking about new replies to those arguments and adding them to this FAQ.
## Are you a SJW?
SJW: there is a seed of SJW in me.
One major difference between me and the stereotypical SJW is that I never engage in lengthy discussions.
I believe that you cannot change people's mind's, and that learning tech is more worthy of my time.
I limit myself to listening as much as I can to learn new arguments.
So the rationale of my actions is *not* to convince anyone, but rather:
- increase the monetary cost of censorship by binding politics to tech
- group up like minded people who don't like censorship
I do see that one alternative scenario is that if we do nothing, maybe there will be more and more contact with Western countries, and the Chinese will see for themselves that we are not that bad, and eventually request democracy.
1. Even if programmers get very powerful, it is not very likely that they will succeed to undo the dictatorship, they simply don't have enough power.
I'd rather have a less strong dictatorship, than one with good programmers.
My bad [here](https://twitter.com/cirosantilli/status/579270450984984576), the precise term is "jail". I'm *not* talking about: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re-education_through_labor> Unfortunately I can't edit a Tweet.
- 2M in China : <https://www.quora.com/Approximately-how-many-programmers-are-there-in-the-world><http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/there-are-185-million-software-developers-in-the-world-but-which-country-has-the-most/>
He doesn't approve or disapprove of the Chinese government or of my private actions.
The only thing that my employer *does* believe in is that employees can have their own political opinions, and that this should not affect hiring decisions.
This is a point that makes me worry, but consider:
- what matters are statistics. Maybe FLG people live longer than non FLG in average. But we will never have statistics because of censorship
- maybe people should be allowed to choose how they want to die, not to take medication if they don't want to
- maybe the number of people killed during persecution vastly outnumbers those who died because they would not take medication
- several religions, including Christianism have miraculous cure claims
- maybe the main reason why communists banned FLG is the political threat it posed, but that a ban was unjustified given the situation. Christian crosses are being taken down as of 2016, have they stopped taking their medications as well?
- many some of those people would also have died soon if they had taken medication
- maybe not all Falun Gong believers thought that it was wise to stop taking medication. But their religion was banned anyways.
### Falun Gong is completely different in the West than it was in China
I believe that it has changed.
It has become more organized.
People are better educated in general, and discourse must be different to appeal to them, e.g. underplaying the religious aspect.
If you know more ways in which it has changed, let me know.
But I still don't think it justifies the ban.
And once again, we can know nothing for sure about the past in China because of censorship.
Even if you saw something yourself, how can you be sure that it is representative?
And now that it has changed, maybe China should unban it?